IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vmeet] Experience as a remote attendee

Simon Pietro Romano <spromano@unina.it> Mon, 11 April 2016 08:22 UTC

Return-Path: <spromano@unina.it>
X-Original-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758C312E8B2 for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 01:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hTQPSI_Pa4g8 for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 01:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brc1.unina.it (brc1.unina.it [192.132.34.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 608D912E8AF for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 01:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1460362948-05ce3776f2400aa0001-CNPnNC
Received: from smtp1.unina.it (smtp1.unina.it [192.132.34.61]) by brc1.unina.it with ESMTP id 8DbFLfsmHY9LJBLq (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:22:28 +0200 (CEST)
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: spromano@unina.it
X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 192.132.34.61
Received: from [143.225.28.167] ([143.225.28.167]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp1.unina.it (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u3B8MQXb017207 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:22:27 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
From: Simon Pietro Romano <spromano@unina.it>
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [vmeet] Experience as a remote attendee
In-Reply-To: <570B5D75.8070103@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:21:39 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1CB18B40-2625-4644-B647-99A987C9C378@unina.it>
References: <D51111F6-66B9-4FAF-9B6D-FF9AE7E20D0D@att.com> <5707FBD9.6070506@gmail.com> <20160409020147.GA3997@verdi> <6EC9873F-B427-475B-B187-BE352676C4C9@isoc.org> <2FC2AFBA-5B33-44CE-A618-890B742EE5EC@unina.it> <570B5D75.8070103@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
To: =?utf-8?Q?=22Martin_J=2E_D=C3=BCrst=22?= <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp1.unina.it[192.132.34.61]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1460362948
X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES256-SHA
X-Barracuda-URL: http://192.132.34.50:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at unina.it
X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=6.0 tests=BSF_SC0_MISMATCH_TO
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.28631 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 BSF_SC0_MISMATCH_TO Envelope rcpt doesn't match header
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vmeet/pl1eixsSOrXZem5NcqKkuqS42OE>
Cc: "vmeet@ietf.org" <vmeet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [vmeet] Experience as a remote attendee
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/vmeet/>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 08:22:33 -0000

Hello Martin,

> You call such daily variations "weird", but aren't they pretty usual? People don't use the Internet with the same intensity all day round. Depending on the overall usage profile, usage will be higher during business hours, or during leisure hours. With video these days contributing a lot to overall bandwidth consumption, usage during leisure hours can easily get higher than during business hours.

The problem is how you define leisure hours. Can the 1am to 6 am time interval (Italian time) be considered as a leisure slot? It depends on what one means by the term “leisure”, I guess!

Simon

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email