Re: [vmeet] Suggestion

[Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>]

Fred Baker (fred) <[e-mail]> wrote:
    > video content less active (limit it to slide projection as opposed to a
    > human face, or change the codec, or have the human able to turn it off
    > without losing audio, etc). If we have packet sequence numbers, maybe
    > we want to capture realtime statistics on packet lose, delay variation,
    > and so on.

If we could have all slides uploaded before the meeting, then we wouldn't
have to project the VGA signal, but could project remote controlled PDF
instead.  I think that meetecho did this before.

I like the MOS ideas.

    > Part of this also has to do with the chair's "cockpit". From Lee and my
    > perspective chairing v6ops on Monday, life was pretty busy. My laptop
    > was projecting slides, and I was interacting with speakers and people
    > in the room. In the room we had a jabber scribe and someone taking
    > notes on what is oddly called an Etherpad. Lee had jabber in a pane,
    > the Etherpad on a pane, his own notes on a pane, and meetecho control
    > on a separate laptop. I didn't actually bring it (intended to but
    > managed to leave it in my room in an overflow hotel), but I usually
    > have an iPad for my own notes. Add to that Lee being able to chase the
    > blue sheets, interact with the A/V team, or otherwise run around the
    > room, and - well, let's just say I'm glad I have a co-chair. It takes
    > two. At this point, I'm wondering how to simplify all that. Not
    > offering suggestions right now, but I think we need to think about that
    > in the context of virtualizing meetings.

1) note takers could be remote.
2) why did Lee have both etherpad and his own notes?
3) I like etherpad and use it regularly, but couldn't notes go into jabber?


--
Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-