IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vmeet] finding the IETF Hubs

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 16 November 2016 02:48 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C4A51295E4 for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:48:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W5Cl9uShdVog for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:48:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it0-x229.google.com (mail-it0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD91D1295FA for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:48:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it0-x229.google.com with SMTP id b123so33678036itb.0 for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:48:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=3IET44YlGqmkRIdquvdUwREtHf42yXH1A3MJ0kqR/58=; b=Yxyvu1fXhvaStX71n5ogHqlePQRCtyGoYjQXBmqNFZl1bGHJNAUJZF5x/pfA6l+tfT J2Hb/d3733s5UNuS5/BC2pH+K/G8Z7mtB8JKgGbLRUYpwL+elUGnqQTSDaIKi9S0Oq3G 8XaCfc8TdWL4lBrjSO2kWAVOiJkJBDnpQsq5FLLpR+jBhyflGAQy9nsCF7Yp4DN1UMBT vlMwd0TOgkWNWB1wQKkUju8TxbhqcfO6BY91uMSJ9EQQrKq3DMxQuMWYP/2/C1SDO1aK h5vUoSRGyvkgX+GxZ4BLaw2VwGxpiRmx4UEsJ+quHSKg9kSOnUl1fhWC1W7phA2Ffxw+ CmHg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3IET44YlGqmkRIdquvdUwREtHf42yXH1A3MJ0kqR/58=; b=gkrqpK5Nwoh13rdqnAjv6aIx8SBJ8DX59y69fRaiVBYkVJBCsRREFGEv2RdcHMGaU7 UPIARfFUV3mFSeKWR+3fnc4wGC3754+eHctDQ5TGiH9yaMp4YU71oKTE6VFboekIWpCW DClBzZzTqEAUjCLazELFk/c4ZMKIt+Eq/QqrWw27BdZWkVYsj3eKfzV/eK/rnT9UebjT siyh29T6Loxjq/jafkCsVsim10pFhUBjMjEPAjL8+0lNyk+U+8zCuHkBXXAGCQTGWjfS nWo2u906hIIRmayArCoHozjjwvmq5AOipPSBUJIE/eQGzg/Qsv3anIGAX2jFhaUX1oYq ukOA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfGc6CUVBm4cnr3FIkvpT6thp+K/JnxhSEU9NLSvFNJTDvYkjARjq/B+6cjAbCvoGL5nx9mwEiBCjgPxA==
X-Received: by 10.107.146.196 with SMTP id u187mr908165iod.34.1479264500968; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:48:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: dhruvdhody@gmail.com
X-Google-Sender-Delegation: dhruvdhody@gmail.com
Received: by 10.50.21.232 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:48:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1rd69WLyfy42qg-58-qkehk3=5opHAk2fRsRbk2VSXvu8A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAG4d1rd69WLyfy42qg-58-qkehk3=5opHAk2fRsRbk2VSXvu8A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:48:20 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: vSzuiscuoIPDpnf6QTpk4dZYj8M
Message-ID: <CAB75xn5QMZmdm+gDy8KiOeKTMQxnbiiG2Dddhrgj1a5NAzvZFA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0560b21bf1060541621b24
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vmeet/vFKgBBoDxs31fIgUp-DTHXXX_NE>
Cc: vmeet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vmeet] finding the IETF Hubs
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/vmeet/>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 02:48:24 -0000

Hi Alia,

This time we did not have a hub in Bangalore.

The good news is some of the participants that were in Bangalore Hub
before, are in fact attending this IETF, and are part of Hackathon/WGs.

IMHO remote participants (especially who have attended an IETF meeting
before) prefer using meetecho or seeing the recording later offline
independently.

Thus the Hub needs to offer more than just the logistics of the remote
meeting, it should be an opportunity for discussions, networking etc. Which
can offer something for the new and the experienced participants. We are
planning a few things so, that we can organize hubs which are more engaging
in the future.

Thanks!
Dhruv


On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:

> I also tried to find more details on the hubs by looking in the wiki at
> the page for Remote Hubs for IETF 97 (https://www.ietf.org/
> registration/MeetingWiki/wiki/ietf97#remote_hubs ) but the page hasn't
> even been created.
>
> It is useful to have this information.
>
> Regards,
> Alia
>
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet
>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email