Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk about remote hubs, local communities, etc?

Joly MacFie <joly@punkcast.com> Thu, 13 July 2017 23:51 UTC

Return-Path: <joly.nyc@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5851317A8 for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 16:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Iag5NAgPsJT4 for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 16:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22d.google.com (mail-lf0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17F8612EC05 for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 16:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id z78so45313087lff.0 for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 16:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZTgs1yvo7lc3SF3Jr+LzXeupUfopgJJus8LTAbf8Bt0=; b=ugvpanorFOG95SkHHrzL4yMw4bA6y3Pg41jLJd9594cevbV+Y3vj7EK/M6uizNxILJ TWpJVAusZ5xueWLUzuYN457aGU7Kvtur55Oro0XzF95Xhwp3kpajc0UrAxIckCWg1Y5X +gihSmB3gT9waiM33jq+fVCqAvJe6LjW6Q2lMlHWsZu/HwCSM15zFBwVmivWKu76KXua NTDo/qZZ7UXQyxlfh+ciN1fMf0KAX33vJ8QskNWEDEo1wMACiRtxhWqGM23Y2aqY8HE1 wsI7gbhsSfegs7biVsPDLfXDi80qn8MyYmb5gEsf2HoJcGwqcv118NGJ3u9o1U4jR+ZA O04Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZTgs1yvo7lc3SF3Jr+LzXeupUfopgJJus8LTAbf8Bt0=; b=eVq+Y6vD0DBS0uszTr9YHMWf+3JDdxMKJCOUIjHvzqn27Ftesa5DdV23UFY6DHmcWz TNyZA3lqHx9CLURwUvLZfm2zrT5lVclA1zRDdAq8QFdX/NVaZA2m8mg0IPnRe60YKljl whwortvYJiZV9E1NhZpkFbR4Dh4TpybA+lp3mlyKn03HgG0dBpAp2fhWWKSyoTrTTMji t1bMm3AAtFkgvmOSmdunbIgkk2IScM7A6SYT+fxoCkju6iLO+V8bGZtOrjE+3irw9xIM 8GLf90ESQBppSsN9u46cJ/V3uozu2kS0d9BAvTHEY9r0BrhdTXPBLiF3SaodWmD86upQ QSFg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112dDuYLHVMk0IEGzWbYDedkYQlIfr25kyhsafy21YIGfwSL6FUe Vrd/LuL51KMbDUFLzScxbD+Iy4qTCw==
X-Received: by 10.46.9.82 with SMTP id 79mr1970731ljj.89.1499989908294; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 16:51:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: joly@punkcast.com
Sender: joly.nyc@gmail.com
Received: by 10.25.203.201 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 16:51:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <344501606.4498898.1499978169216@mail.yahoo.com>
References: <CAG4d1rdcexVq9tzyUe9YkhxXxovtnXHri6QJYnr=CtTes7d-KA@mail.gmail.com> <7C01F627C8359CEDBAC06663@PSB> <1218340531.4451377.1499975473084@mail.yahoo.com> <47EEF3CDA3FF3D28A436E23F@PSB> <344501606.4498898.1499978169216@mail.yahoo.com>
From: Joly MacFie <joly@punkcast.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 19:51:07 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: xpTeBx4DJC4nH2H6LNn94fUupN0
Message-ID: <CAM9VJk26_rwyK3DQhDM2UNJdj3v8=0X9WeWy4fg5weCFkO4ZMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nalini J Elkins <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, vmeet <vmeet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114b0af0a6943f05543b9d1c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vmeet/zQXwuyOvxAuawe5XQNtyp_l8UOc>
Subject: Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk about remote hubs, local communities, etc?
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/vmeet/>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 23:51:54 -0000

Individuals attending hubs can still register as remote participants and
interact via jabber etc, surely? The problem I was highlighting at ICANN
was the effort to set up audio/video interactive hubs. Similarly ICANN
still enables interaction via Adobe Connect, and there is nothing to stop
communal viewing.

At both ICANN meetings, and the IGF, there is no better way to keep up with
what happens in other rooms, either live, or catching up during breaks,
than text transcriptions.  In the past, while these are projected in the
room, or emebedded in remote participation platforms, one has to dig to
find the correct standalone streamtext urls. however there is improvement.
One thing I have agitated for,
​  is for immediate posting of the rough transcripts. The tendency is for
these to disappear, and sat on for correction, until the iron is well cold.

j



On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Nalini J Elkins <
nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com> wrote:

> Agreed.
>
> Viewing, not participation.  For now.
>
> Thanks,
> Nalini
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
> *To:* Nalini J Elkins <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>; Alia Atlas <
> akatlas@gmail.com>; vmeet <vmeet@ietf.org>
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 13, 2017 10:30 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk about remote
> hubs, local communities, etc?
>
>
>
> --On Thursday, July 13, 2017 19:51 +0000 Nalini J Elkins
> <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com> wrote:
>
> > John,
> > Remote viewing hubs are important for the developing world.
> > They are a way to do outreach and to incubate new
> > participants.   It will take time for us and them to become
> > effective.   However, let us not in any way diminish the
> > efforts that have been put out by so many to do outreach. We
> > have seen hubs in Latin America, India and Africa.   I hope
> > to see them continue.
>
> Again, and I can't say this too many times, I think remote
> viewing hubs and other sorts of gathering separate from IETF
> meetings are a great idea and should be encouraged in any way
> possible.  My sole concerns is about remote participation by a
> group (hub or otherwise).
>
> Remote _participation_ arrangements can easily favor some types
> of work over others and, however unintentially, discourage
> participating in some IETF efforts.  If they are sponsored by a
> company (or held on its premises) and primarily draw people
> associated with that company of who are associated with the
> company's main area of interest, they carry risks to IETF's
> norms about participation as individuals and even could raise
> questions about collaborations to influence standards
> development work to favor particular organizations or sets of
> organizations.  In addition, fairness in queue management for
> questions and comments would require far more skill, training,
> and attention fro WG Chairs than we have seen so far.
>
> I've convinced that, if we are motivated enough and  in the long
> term and with an adequate investment in training, procedural
> reviews, lawyers, and possibly tools, we can get around those
> problems and make remote participation hubs work in a
> satisfactory way.  But I'm not certain the community cares
> enough or is willing to make the needed investments (remembering
> that they will almost certainly require more attention from and
> put more pressure on the IESG and WG Chairs).  More important
> and precisely because I think remove viewing / observation
> arrangements are very important, I don't want to risk getting
> distracted from that effort by trying to work in parallel on the
> very hard problems of remote participation hubs.
>
>
> best,
>   john
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet
>
>


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
--------------------------------------------------------------
-