Re: [vmeet] what's been working/failed/tried in hubs?

John Leslie <john@jlc.net> Mon, 10 October 2016 11:45 UTC

Return-Path: <john@jlc.net>
X-Original-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B2D12962B for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 04:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CLF3ELoDQceC for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 04:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.jlc.net (mailhost.jlc.net [199.201.159.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0741294DF for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 04:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mailhost.jlc.net (Postfix, from userid 104) id D73C5908C86; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 07:44:51 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 07:44:51 -0400
From: John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20161010114451.GO94244@verdi>
References: <CAG4d1re1td4oaPpHMHn7Ka4OYT37B6QRsygM1uvWZhDTzqyJGA@mail.gmail.com> <CAB75xn79vU1xyv9Bk=5LHjDekRkO9ARwN9A8pCXRhuJF5Cm9vg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn79vU1xyv9Bk=5LHjDekRkO9ARwN9A8pCXRhuJF5Cm9vg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vmeet/zqcfD6Z0a7sbwPjzesXsyinTGk0>
Cc: vmeet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vmeet] what's been working/failed/tried in hubs?
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/vmeet/>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 11:45:57 -0000

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> (1) WG champion: Having one or two WG champion at the Hub helped to set the
> tone, go over the WG agenda in advance, answer questions and continue the
> discussion after the WG meeting.

   What time commitment is expected? (I assume the expertise expected is
for a single Working Group.)

> (2) Discussions/Hot-Topics: Most participants can join remotely on their
> own from home/work. We need to make it worthwhile for someone to travel to
> the Hub, so it is important that we make sure that the hub can offer
> something more.... This could be a lively discussion, networking, side
> meetings on some HOT technology, tutorial etc.

  What's your experience with folks who need to follow more than one stream?
(I have had to remain near-home in order to cover everything I need to.
Perhaps an academic setting could maintain 8 rooms; but essentially no
workplace can do that.)

> (3) Agenda - getting the IETF agenda early, would help a lot in making the
> sub-set agenda for the hub based on interest/timezone etc.

   What do you mean, early? Alia certainly has access to _premature_ agendas;
but I'm not sure they'd be helpful. And, of course, agendas _do_ change even
after the start of an IETF week...

--
John Leslie <john@jlc.net>