[vnfpool] Follow-up question from the BOF

Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 22 July 2014 20:14 UTC

Return-Path: <mls.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6521B28B2 for <vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZuVukkaaHK4M for <vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com (mail-we0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ECA01A035B for <vnfpool@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id k48so168071wev.27 for <vnfpool@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:14:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zbAba67fuwNCZn47jBNN1PuG4wQrKwqp4U407pYfbn8=; b=tyyZVa8B6sw/S5eudJBek9ERqyib+o8+SgA90hfkldtSHjLpV6LWDfaHnNeTfgD4Bo w1qYRdl1u86fC4oH7Wah1NU6INaQFmsQo2UqVyXidCOR8lV7nL/ZEuLZxNifAsIC5pSl NZiNZlDtjPrqzSW1K/1HeGNkftpzeIjLL26HehTSHW8z2FtDwWcM3A4HWk6WxBT6HjMd fCACH6rA7p8Mb2vAfZ8abGgI0wXIsDooMM6In1M20BMrONwXkBQk3eUBb5Fq2XsvjbtN qPSEO9886UEhfj469GYhTDE5kvyOUXOBHapxk+AKVP8FrItSwkUzZs5FGmIqPUW9ENmi axXw==
X-Received: by with SMTP id p11mr17933684wiv.68.1406060061927; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:14:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-9b6b.meeting.ietf.org ([2001:67c:370:152:98c:d86c:ae9a:cca7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d12sm299028wjx.0.2014. for <vnfpool@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:14:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53CEC61A.9010104@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 16:14:18 -0400
From: Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vnfpool@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vnfpool/6I8x86hbbo7novgj_2LcOG5EHfY
Subject: [vnfpool] Follow-up question from the BOF
X-BeenThere: vnfpool@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for virtual network function resource pooling." <vnfpool.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vnfpool>, <mailto:vnfpool-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vnfpool/>
List-Post: <mailto:vnfpool@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vnfpool-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnfpool>, <mailto:vnfpool-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 20:14:24 -0000

Dear all,

This is a follow-up question from your responsible AD about the first 
hum we did take in the BOF @ IETF-90.

The questions asked was if the technical problem to be worked on is clear?
A majority on the session did hum against that the technical problem to 
be solved is clear.

However, from the discussion during the BOF session it is not clear to 
me that the technical problem isn't understood.

So now the question:
Why do people are not convinced that the technical problem is solveable?

So, enlight me :)