Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC?
Zongning <zongning@huawei.com> Wed, 22 January 2014 01:42 UTC
Return-Path: <zongning@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275191A01B8 for <vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:42:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.736
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.736 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Chy6BBUmsdFe for <vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:41:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080011A0359 for <vnfpool@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:41:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BCT68166; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:41:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:40:55 +0000
Received: from NKGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.35) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:41:56 +0000
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.56]) by nkgeml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.35]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:41:47 +0800
From: Zongning <zongning@huawei.com>
To: Zongning <zongning@huawei.com>, "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "vnfpool@ietf.org" <vnfpool@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC?
Thread-Index: Ac8W0iZRlSKtK4GNSoKpOSf5YsDYgwAOsVzwAAFphcA=
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:41:47 +0000
Message-ID: <B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC666779258686F9@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <0b3501cf16d2$2a3c1e80$7eb45b80$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.28]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC?
X-BeenThere: vnfpool@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for virtual network function resource pooling." <vnfpool.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vnfpool>, <mailto:vnfpool-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vnfpool/>
List-Post: <mailto:vnfpool@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vnfpool-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnfpool>, <mailto:vnfpool-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:42:00 -0000
Sorry, item 1) is obviously not finished. :-) 1) SFC targets on steering packets among service function nodes. vnfpool focuses on redundancy for service nodes, e.g., selecting standby nodes, handling nodes transition/failure cases, without caring about how to construct the data path. Again, my fault. -Ning > -----Original Message----- > From: Zongning > Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 9:34 AM > To: 'adrian@olddog.co.uk'; vnfpool@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? > > Hi, Adrian, > > Thanks for raising this question. Actually vnfpool folks have been discussing this > question a lot since the very beginning of this work. > > We believe vnfpool and SFC are independent and complementary mainly due to > the below reasons: > 1) SFC targets on steering packets among service function nodes. vnfpool > focuses on redundancy for service nodes, e.g., selecting standby nodes, > handling nodes transition/failure cases, without caring how > 2) vnfpool manager in our proposal could interact with SFC control entity to: 1) > advertise redundant service nodes; 2) notify status of redundant nodes when > required; 3) receive resiliency requirements from SFC control entity (if any); and > so on. > 3) vnfpool is not only used in "chained service nodes", but applicable to other > cases where service nodes are not necessarily sequentially connected. > > I appreciate any further feedback and advice from you or IESG, as I believe > these feedback will greatly improve the quality of our proposed charter. > > Thanks. > > -Ning > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: vnfpool [mailto:vnfpool-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel > > Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 1:57 AM > > To: vnfpool@ietf.org > > Subject: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? > > > > Hi, > > > > The IESG is looking at the BoF requests for London, and a question came up > on > > the overlap between the proposal here and items 4 and 5 in the SFC Charter. > > > > I think it would be valuable if you could discuss the overlap and the > > interaction between the two efforts so that there is a clear view. > > > > Thanks, > > Adrian > > > > _______________________________________________ > > vnfpool mailing list > > vnfpool@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnfpool
- [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? Adrian Farrel
- Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? King, Daniel
- Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? Melinda Shore
- Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? King, Daniel
- Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? Susan Hares
- Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? Melinda Shore
- Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? Zongning
- Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? Susan Hares
- Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? Susan Hares
- Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? Zongning
- Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? Zongning
- Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? Zongning
- Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? Qin Wu
- Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? Qin Wu
- Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? Qin Wu
- Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? LAC Chidung
- Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? Qin Wu
- Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? Linda Dunbar
- Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? Linda Dunbar
- Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? Susan Hares
- Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? LAC Chidung
- Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? LAC Chidung
- Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? Linda Dunbar
- Re: [vnfpool] Overlap with SFC? LAC Chidung