Re: [vnfpool] VNFPool BoF Minutes

Melinda, thanks, understood; but so we don't even record the "sense" of a topic in the minutes?  DH

-----Original Message-----
From: vnfpool [mailto:vnfpool-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Melinda Shore
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 12:09 PM
To: vnfpool@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vnfpool] VNFPool BoF Minutes

On 3/12/14 10:44 AM, Holmes, David W [CTO] wrote:
> Specifically, as I recollect, the outgoing assumption was that this
> was not a topic yet ripe for the creation of a WG, but I don't see how
> this was recorded; or maybe it is by omission; i.e. no positive
> statement to move to a WG?

Generally, decisions are not made at meetings, but on mailing lists.  It's sometimes helpful to get the sense of the room at a meeting to get a better handle on how people are feeling about a given topic, but that's not quite the same as a decision.

It looks like we're making reasonable progress towards having a working group chartered, but there's still some work to do to clarify several documents and to tighten up the proposed charter.  In that sense it was an extremely productive meeting, in terms of identifying areas where there's confusion about what's being proposed, how it's scoped, and so on.  We're working towards getting a revised problem statement out in the next week or so, and on a proposed charter revision as well.  We'll keep the mailing list in the loop as things proceed.

Melinda

_______________________________________________
vnfpool mailing list
vnfpool@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnfpool

________________________________

This e-mail may contain Sprint proprietary information intended for the sole use of the recipient(s). Any use by others is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies of the message.