[vnfpool] New revision of VNFPool Problem Statement posted
Zongning <zongning@huawei.com> Thu, 10 April 2014 03:22 UTC
Return-Path: <zongning@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E521F1A006F for <vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 20:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.472
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.472 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I6L_kdZye3A9 for <vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 20:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C50C1A007E for <vnfpool@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 20:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BFL75924; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 03:21:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 04:20:53 +0100
Received: from NKGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.35) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 04:21:57 +0100
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.85]) by nkgeml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.35]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:21:53 +0800
From: Zongning <zongning@huawei.com>
To: "vnfpool@ietf.org" <vnfpool@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New revision of VNFPool Problem Statement posted
Thread-Index: Ac9UbATHM7NhTJ8NTjunJ2NkO54O2g==
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 03:21:53 +0000
Message-ID: <B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC6667796610DCEE@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.22]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC6667796610DCEEnkgeml501mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vnfpool/GRzBpRsIReGmhRiZqKpz8R75VJc
Subject: [vnfpool] New revision of VNFPool Problem Statement posted
X-BeenThere: vnfpool@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for virtual network function resource pooling." <vnfpool.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vnfpool>, <mailto:vnfpool-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vnfpool/>
List-Post: <mailto:vnfpool@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vnfpool-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnfpool>, <mailto:vnfpool-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 03:22:03 -0000
Hi, folks, The new revision (-04) of VNFPool Problem Statement I-D is available on the below page. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zong-vnfpool-problem-statement/ Here are the major changes: 1) Clarify VNFPool architecture and intended scope. 1. Add new section of VNF Pools before the section of Problem. This new section is mainly to outline our scope based on high level description of VNF Pools architecture. 2. Add text to clarify that we are specifically concerned with reliability (e.g. redundancy model, state sharing) that is managed inside the VNF. We are only concerned with the whole VNF set (or forwarding graph) to the extent that it involves reliability impact on adjacent instances of different VNFs. 3. We focus on reliability mechanisms based on VNF pool. Other VNF management aspects such as scaling, load balancing are out of scope. 2) Update terminologies to define Service Control Entity, and delete Pool User as the pool will be internal to VNF only. 3) Re-arrange the text in section of Problems. 4) Update text of VNF instance performance degradation in section of Problems. 5) Update text of Reliable Transport in section of Problems. 6) Add text to explain why service availability is not in scope in section of Problems. 7) Re-write the section describing the relationship of VNFPool and SFC. 8) Add text of transfer of security states in section of Security Consideration. We hope that the changes have addressed most of the comments, and reflected most of the suggestions during London BoF. Please review this new revision. Your further comments and suggestions are highly appreciated! Thanks. -Ning
- [vnfpool] New revision of VNFPool Problem Stateme… Zongning
- Re: [vnfpool] New revision of VNFPool Problem Sta… PEDRO ANDRES ARANDA GUTIERREZ
- [vnfpool] 答复: New revision of VNFPool Problem Sta… Zongning
- Re: [vnfpool] New revision of VNFPool Problem Sta… Zu Qiang
- [vnfpool] 答复: New revision of VNFPool Problem Sta… Zongning
- Re: [vnfpool] New revision of VNFPool Problem Sta… Zu Qiang
- [vnfpool] 答复: New revision of VNFPool Problem Sta… Zongning