[vnfpool] Version 05 of VNFPool Problem Statement
Zongning <zongning@huawei.com> Mon, 05 May 2014 08:46 UTC
Return-Path: <zongning@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02EA1A0159
for <vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 May 2014 01:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id VMvoxvHOSzDI for <vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 5 May 2014 01:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACF51A0157
for <vnfpool@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 May 2014 01:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com)
([172.18.7.190])
by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued)
with ESMTP id BDV21913; Mon, 05 May 2014 08:46:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) by
lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 5 May 2014 09:45:31 +0100
Received: from nkgeml409-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.40) by
lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 5 May 2014 09:46:43 +0100
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.85]) by
nkgeml409-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001;
Mon, 5 May 2014 16:46:38 +0800
From: Zongning <zongning@huawei.com>
To: "vnfpool@ietf.org" <vnfpool@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Version 05 of VNFPool Problem Statement
Thread-Index: Ac9oPocGo3WIP3ImTQ6fDXxa8QDf+A==
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 08:46:38 +0000
Message-ID: <B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC66677966117311@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.24]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC66677966117311nkgeml501mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vnfpool/cwl2wAQBrPSnSBPypPInCZEao2I
Subject: [vnfpool] Version 05 of VNFPool Problem Statement
X-BeenThere: vnfpool@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for virtual network function resource pooling."
<vnfpool.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vnfpool>,
<mailto:vnfpool-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vnfpool/>
List-Post: <mailto:vnfpool@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vnfpool-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnfpool>,
<mailto:vnfpool-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 08:46:57 -0000
Hi, A new revision -05 of VNFPool Problem Statement I-D is posted as below: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-zong-vnfpool-problem-statement-05.txt Many thanks to Qiang, Marco, and Georgios for your comments on -04 version. I mainly incorporated your suggestions, as well as further clarified VNFPool scope and relation to SFC. Main changes: 1) Update definition of VNF set to clarify the relation to VNF pools; 2) Focus VNFPool scope to internal VNF, and interface between VNF and Service Control Entity, *not* communications between VNFs; 3) Change 5.4 to "Interaction between VNF and Service Control Entity"; 4) Emphasize that we currently assume VNF pool contains the instances of same functional type, *not* different VNF components; 5) Update 6.3 about VNFPool relation to SFC; Please folks continue reviewing the new version. Your comments are ALWAYS welcome! -Ning