Re: [vnfpool] Preliminary Agend Posted

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Fri, 07 February 2014 23:36 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F921A0566 for <vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 15:36:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.946
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4V3WdxntGJS5 for <vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 15:36:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (hhc-web3.hickoryhill-consulting.com [64.9.205.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37061A0507 for <vnfpool@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 15:36:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=64.112.195.202;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'Zongning'" <zongning@huawei.com>, "'King, Daniel'" <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>, "'Diego R. Lopez'" <diego@tid.es>
References: <B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC66677925876516@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <D6B1C8D2-2ABF-419C-AD37-88D918472904@tid.es> <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A0EC044@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local> <B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC66677925878ECB@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC66677925878ECB@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 18:35:58 -0500
Message-ID: <002201cf245d$5b24a380$116dea80$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0023_01CF2433.72507040"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQLQelspcEB/JHi56eAUTIOVOBfW4ALvtJBDAoLaKwMB0ld7GJhtnrRQ
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Cc: vnfpool@ietf.org, 'JP Vasseur' <jpv@cisco.com>, 'Julien Meuric' <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Subject: Re: [vnfpool] Preliminary Agend Posted
X-BeenThere: vnfpool@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for virtual network function resource pooling." <vnfpool.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vnfpool>, <mailto:vnfpool-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vnfpool/>
List-Post: <mailto:vnfpool@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vnfpool-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnfpool>, <mailto:vnfpool-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:36:10 -0000

Ning: 

 

I am flexible for movement of this BOF.

 

Sue 

 

From: vnfpool [mailto:vnfpool-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Zongning
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 8:31 PM
To: King, Daniel; Diego R. Lopez
Cc: vnfpool@ietf.org; 'JP Vasseur'; Julien Meuric
Subject: Re: [vnfpool] Preliminary Agend Posted

 

Hi, Dan and Diego,

 

Yes, we are doing some coordination with help from ADs, and hoping that this conflict could be resolved eventually…

 

Nevertheless, as Dan said, in any case that the conflict still remains, we do hope that the operators (as individual J) involved in ETSI NFV would present their view (use cases, requirements, etc.) during the BoF.

 

Thanks.

 

-Ning

 

From: King, Daniel [mailto:d.king@lancaster.ac.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 6:59 PM
To: Diego R. Lopez; Zongning
Cc: vnfpool@ietf.org; Julien Meuric; 'JP Vasseur'
Subject: RE: [vnfpool] Preliminary Agend Posted

 

Hi All, 

 

Unfortunately a number of other people are in the same situation, myself included. Scheduling IETF sessions (playing 3D chess blind folded) is occasionally going to lead to a conflict of groups, I have spoken to the PCE co-chairs and they will flag the issue and suggest a change, but it is likely the scheduling will remain. Either way, I will attend the vnfpool session.

 

Hi Diego, It will be important for operators, especially those involved with ETSI (NFV specification development) to present their technical requirements during the vnfpool BoF. Can you let me know if a colleague would be able to present/discuss your operator view of what vnfpool should be looking to solve? I will follow-up with you offline on this topic. 

 

Br, Dan.

 

From: vnfpool [mailto:vnfpool-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Diego R. Lopez
Sent: February 5, 2014 1:00 AM
To: Zongning
Cc: vnfpool@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vnfpool] Preliminary Agend Posted

 

Hi, 

 

I'll have very likely to attend PCE (a draft to present) in the same time slot...

 

Be goode,

 

On 1 Feb 2014, at 05:33 , Zongning <zongning@huawei.com> wrote:

 

Hi,

 

Please see below IETF 89th Preliminary Agenda:

 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/89/agenda.html> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/89/agenda.html

 

VNFPool BoF has been initially scheduled on Tuesday morning. Please let me know if you have conflicts or concerns on this date/time.

 

Thanks.

 

-Ning

_______________________________________________
vnfpool mailing list
 <mailto:vnfpool@ietf.org> vnfpool@ietf.org
 <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnfpool> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnfpool

 


--
"Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno"

Dr Diego R. Lopez
Telefonica I+D

http://people.tid.es/diego.lopez/

e-mail: diego@tid.es
Tel:    +34 913 129 041
Mobile: +34 682 051 091
-----------------------------------------

 

 

  _____  


Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx