[vnfpool] 答复: VNFPool BoF Session Agenda Posted
Zongning <zongning@huawei.com> Fri, 21 February 2014 08:08 UTC
Return-Path: <zongning@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC0F1A04CB for <vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:08:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -98.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-98.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3,
MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EJUPvEVKkkZC for
<vnfpool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:08:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE7A1A005B for <vnfpool@ietf.org>;
Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:08:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com)
([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued)
with ESMTP id BDU79432; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:07:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) by
lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:07:41 +0000
Received: from NKGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.32) by
lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:07:55 +0000
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.56]) by
nkgeml401-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.32]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001;
Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:07:47 +0800
From: Zongning <zongning@huawei.com>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, "vnfpool@ietf.org" <vnfpool@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: VNFPool BoF Session Agenda Posted
Thread-Index: Ac8q2nKD+QdR1naZR9aqni/RejtCrwD/xI4QAABcrMA=
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:07:46 +0000
Message-ID: <B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC6667792587D363@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC6667792587BFD2@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
<B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43C83105@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43C83105@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.202.9.180]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC6667792587D363nkgeml501mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vnfpool/i7nN8vRqeTS9jywxzxx8i4UFC_U
Subject: [vnfpool] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogVk5GUG9vbCBCb0YgU2Vzc2lvbiBBZ2VuZGEg?=
=?gb2312?b?UG9zdGVk?=
X-BeenThere: vnfpool@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for virtual network function resource pooling."
<vnfpool.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vnfpool>,
<mailto:vnfpool-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vnfpool/>
List-Post: <mailto:vnfpool@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vnfpool-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnfpool>,
<mailto:vnfpool-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:08:05 -0000
Hi, Qin, Thank you for raising this issue (again:)). We did look for possibility of avoiding such conflict with PCE, and actually other conflicts mentioned by other folks before. But we found it is very unlikely to re-schedule, considering the facts including the min. length of our session, new conflicts with other WGs like I2RS if we move, etc. So, we decided to keep the current schedule. Again, I apologize for any potential conflicts due to our schedule, even it usually happens in IETF week! -Ning 发件人: Qin Wu 发送时间: 2014年2月21日 8:56 收件人: Zongning; vnfpool@ietf.org 主题: RE: VNFPool BoF Session Agenda Posted Hi, I am aware of IETF agenda update as follows: “ The following session has been added to the agenda: **Monday, March 3 - Afternoon Session III 1630 - 1730 Blenheim RAI sipcore Session Initiation Protocol Core The following sessions have been canceled: **Tuesday, March 4 - Afternoon Session I 1300 - 1400 Richmond/Chelsea/Tower OPS ipfix IP Flow Information Export - CANCELED **Wednesday, March 5 - Afternoon Session II 1520 - 1620 Park Suite OPS opsec Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure - CANCELED The following are changes made to scheduled sessions: **Monday, March 3 - Afternoon Session I 1300 - 1500 Richmond/Chelsea/Tower OPS netconf Network Configuration -Moved FROM Wednesday Afternoon Session I 1300-1500 **Wednesday, March 5 - Afternoon Session I 1300 - 1500 Palace C OPS netmod NETCONF Data Modeling Language -Moved FROM Monday Afternoon Session I 1300-1500 ” Would it possible to consider changing agenda time and avoid conflict with PCE meeting session? Regards! -Qin From: vnfpool [mailto:vnfpool-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Zongning Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 1:46 PM To: vnfpool@ietf.org<mailto:vnfpool@ietf.org> Subject: [vnfpool] VNFPool BoF Session Agenda Posted Hi, Folks, We have posted a VNFPool BoF session agenda: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/agenda/agenda-89-vnfpool Note that this is a draft agenda. If anyone would like to request new, or change agenda time, please let us know as soon as you could. Thanks. - Melinda and Ning