[vnfpool] 答复: New version of draft-xia-vnfpool-use-cases

Zongning <zongning@huawei.com> Mon, 19 May 2014 09:31 UTC

From: Zongning <zongning@huawei.com>
To: "King, Daniel" <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>, "vnfpool@ietf.org" <vnfpool@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New version of draft-xia-vnfpool-use-cases
Thread-Index: Ac9wc2CPy3UHIpkYSk2Qt78Kr/HT+gCzzgtQ
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 09:31:10 +0000
Message-ID: <B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC6667796612992C@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A32347741@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local>
In-Reply-To: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A32347741@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC6667796612992Cnkgeml501mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vnfpool/xP4eyg1L0mTS4F9FOJMGlEDsqAk
Subject: [vnfpool] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogTmV3IHZlcnNpb24gb2YgZHJhZnQteGlhLXZu?= =?gb2312?b?ZnBvb2wtdXNlLWNhc2Vz?=
Precedence: list

Hi, Dan, and other co-authors,

Thank you for the update. I see a lot of improvement since the last version, e.g. alignment with PS I-D on terminologies, more focused use cases.

I have some minor comments as below:

1) In Terminology Section, ¡°STB¡± and ¡°Virtual Application¡± are defined by NOT used in the draft.

2) In Figure 1 ¡°VNF Pool Network Architecture¡±, different pools seem to have same ¡°VNF instance¡±. Is this depicted by purpose? Or we could use ¡°VNF#1 instance¡± in one pool, ¡°VNF#2 instance¡± in another pool, and so on?

3) In Section 3.1, I am not sure I understand the term ¡°VNF-based nodes¡±.

Other general suggestions (but surely these can be done in the near future/longer term, rather than in this version :))

1) We may have separated sections - one for a variety of use cases, another for a list of requirements.

2) We still need more use cases for ¨C 1) VNF pool combining both virtual and non-virtual functional instances; 2) VNF pool using different VNF components;

3) We need more details about service state synchronization, in order to identify clear requirements on protocols, if supported by multi-vendors.

Thanks.

-Ning

·¢¼þÈË: vnfpool [mailto:vnfpool-bounces@ietf.org] ´ú±í King, Daniel
·¢ËÍÊ±¼ä: 2014Äê5ÔÂ16ÈÕ 3:28
ÊÕ¼þÈË: vnfpool@ietf.org
Ö÷Ìâ: [vnfpool] New version of draft-xia-vnfpool-use-cases

Hi All,

As recently mentioned we planned to issue a new version of the general requirements and use case document. This may now be found in various flavours via:

URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-xia-vnfpool-use-cases-01.txt
Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xia-vnfpool-use-cases
Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xia-vnfpool-use-cases-01
Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-xia-vnfpool-use-cases-01

Please review and comment on the list, or if you are shy, the authors (myself included) directly.

We are just collating the final comments for the Mobile Use Case I-D and will submit a new version shortly(TM).

Br, Dan (and the other authors).

[vnfpool] New version of draft-xia-vnfpool-use-ca… King, Daniel
[vnfpool] 答复: New version of draft-xia-vnfpool-us… Zongning