Re: [vnfpool] new VNFPool draft charter

[Zu Qiang <[e-mail]>]

Have a nice day
Zu Qiang

>> -          My assumption is that the output from this proposed WG is one
>> or more generic HA solutions. As we are in the early stage of the
>> discussion, I don't think we shall limit the solution to a specific one.
>> I do have a hard time to understand why the Applicability and Gap
>> Analysis shall be done based on a specific protocol?
>
>IETF work tends to be bottom-up - specific, discrete, concrete pieces of work are
>identified and scoped.  We don't solve A Big Problem and assume it's generally
>applicable, but rather do work of the nature of "Here's how to use <x> to do
><y>."  It may in fact turn out that there's interest in developing an availability
>mechanism based on a different architectural model, and that's okay.
>

[Zu Qiang] Just for my clarification. Does that means all the WG discussion must be based on that specific solution from day one?
>
>Melinda
>
>
>--
>Melinda Shore
>No Mountain Software
>[e-mail]
>
>"Software longa, hardware brevis."
>
>_______________________________________________
>vnfpool mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnfpool