Re: [VoT] How to express duplicate checks with VoT?

This would probably be another category/dimension, I think. Unless you wanted to wrap it into your own definitions of the “P” dimension, where there’d be a “Pu” for “proofed unique” that could be added to that category. 

 — Justin

> On Mar 10, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Rolf Brugger <rolf.brugger@switch.ch> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm new to this list and I hope my question is not totally irrelevant here.
> 
> We have plenty of use cases where RPs need to have confidence, that a person does not have multiple identities in one IdP. I don't see how this aspect of identity quality can be expressed, and I believe it is pretty orthogonal to the P, C, M and A dimensions that are currently specified in the VoT draft.
> 
> We could imagine multiple ways to gradually prove that an identity has been checked against duplicates. The most straightforward approach would be to make sure that unique personal attributes are used only once within one IdP or an IdP federation, like
> - email address(es)
> - mobile phone number
> - home postal address
> - social security number
> - ID / passport number
> - the combination of name and birth date
> - etc.
> 
> Would it make sense to express this in VoT?
> 
> best regards
> 
> Rolf
> 
> 
> -- 
> SWITCH
> --------------------------
> Rolf Brugger, project Swiss edu-ID
> Werdstrasse 2, P.O. Box, 8021 Zurich, Switzerland
> phone +41 44 268 15 15, direct +41 44 268 15 89
> rolf.brugger@switch.ch, http://www.switch.ch
> 
> _______________________________________________
> vot mailing list
> vot@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vot