IETF Logo Mail Archive

[VRRP] A newly proposed draft

Dacheng Zhang <zhangdacheng@huawei.com> Sat, 24 October 2009 15:29 UTC

Return-Path: <zhangdacheng@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: vrrp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vrrp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0D13A67AC for <vrrp@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 08:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5DIogNVZu-tX for <vrrp@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 08:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.67]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E053A63EC for <vrrp@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 08:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KS0009BLZ0R2X@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for vrrp@ietf.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 23:29:15 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.33]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KS0006ERZ0RDD@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for vrrp@ietf.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 23:29:15 +0800 (CST)
Received: from z00133208 ([10.111.12.108]) by szxml06-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KS0003KMZ0QEK@szxml06-in.huawei.com> for vrrp@ietf.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 23:29:15 +0800 (CST)
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 23:29:14 +0800
From: Dacheng Zhang <zhangdacheng@huawei.com>
To: vrrp@ietf.org
Message-id: <003801ca54be$be890290$6c0c6f0a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_m1RA2Y+iBE6ShhnsjWK0zw)"
Thread-index: AcpUvr4RDVUviC2SS4q+8FTKFloztA==
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 10:52:38 -0700
Cc: Radia.Perlman@Sun.COM
Subject: [VRRP] A newly proposed draft
X-BeenThere: vrrp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol <vrrp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp>, <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vrrp>
List-Post: <mailto:vrrp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp>, <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:29:17 -0000

Hi, all:
 
We just proposed a new draft about a simplified vrrp protocol in IETF 76,
which aims to reduce the overhead brought by vrrp signaling packets in
certain cases. Could you please give us some comments and let us know
whether you like the proposed idea. The draft is appended with the email.
 
Thank you in advance.
 
BR
 
Dacheng

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email