Re: [VRRP] What implementations exist of VRRP unified, and of MIB?

Sergei Lissianoi <sergeilissianoi@gmail.com> Thu, 10 February 2011 04:33 UTC

Return-Path: <sergeilissianoi@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vrrp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vrrp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F4FD3A6856 for <vrrp@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 20:33:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.527
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.527 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_IN_NJABL_SPAM=2.072]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EOXWDmDIo2hR for <vrrp@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 20:33:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iw0-f194.google.com (mail-iw0-f194.google.com [209.85.214.194]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD403A67F7 for <vrrp@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 20:33:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iwb12 with SMTP id 12so373574iwb.1 for <vrrp@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:33:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=n3EjDCnNa6GqfoNZgvzDaS4jIDrOqFQ++IiAfnUNSFY=; b=jJIgnLUeO8wzaKHUkBougkNLzqHxbWjEA2lcsSMfXtOksQZ2l52s4btWCy3RP/yLUO ++KrKk+EENMBqzhpcKnXRaAAAxFwN5zkKrBmf1nopkWrOExL790OAnSPdF8jIAdUt2qB oBgwd5111FWgEy2L8ggYD7NnK8X/MgZ+tLU+g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=u3/zlpkeyJElEkbaT/3A30puzWQR24gH5w+AJnHPxZVt/h53Vs7gR9RgBqaXMRV7lL tge0Ip2HfENrBafpekNdJ1w0vbKiZNtbU+vrxe9f+AhzvInr1plG+eoeX4YNnn1dIiB/ 4ZaLbciuyGQXEwahoU8DmxGMJdO+C1H73LyvM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.177.137 with SMTP id bi9mr22922799icb.194.1297312428258; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:33:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.178.3 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 20:33:48 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 23:33:48 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTinv42beygLdZ2Kz3Mj8rR6Nt0iROU4VCo7RbVak@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sergei Lissianoi <sergeilissianoi@gmail.com>
To: vrrp@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [VRRP] What implementations exist of VRRP unified, and of MIB?
X-BeenThere: vrrp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol <vrrp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp>, <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vrrp>
List-Post: <mailto:vrrp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp>, <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 04:34:56 -0000

Avaya Ethernet Routing Switch 8800 supports VRRP for IPv4 and IPv6. No
support for draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-mib-08.txt though.

-- Sergei

>Subject: What implementations exist of VRRP unified, and of MIB?
>From: Radia Perlman <radiaperlman at gmail.com>
>Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:52:20 -0800

> Are there implementations of unified VRRP, and MIB?
>
> (This is for the shepherd writeup for draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-mib-08.txt,
> but it would also be good to know).
>
> Who has implementations of unified VRRP?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Radia