Re: [VRRP] : VRRP IPV6 Session Configuration with different link local local address
Sreenatha Setty <firstname.lastname@example.org> Wed, 23 October 2013 05:51 UTC
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6E511E82E6 for <email@example.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([184.108.40.206]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ot9ukSwWi0E1 for <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:51:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ipinternal.indiabulls.com (ipinternal.indiabulls.com [220.127.116.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E13711E8149 for <email@example.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:51:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,553,1378837800"; d="scan'208";a="34748187"
Received: from GRGHEXCHANGE.grgh.indiabulls.com (172.16.200.20) by GGN-ICAS.grgh.indiabulls.com (172.16.200.245) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 18.104.22.168; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:20:59 +0530
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:20:58 +0530
Thread-Topic: : VRRP IPV6 Session Configuration with different link local local address
From: Sreenatha Setty <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: [VRRP] : VRRP IPV6 Session Configuration with different link local local address
List-Id: Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol <vrrp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vrrp>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 05:51:09 -0000
Hi Sandhya, Good catch from the RFC. - MAY verify that "Count IPvX Addrs" and the list of IPvX address(es) match the IPvX Address(es) configured for the VRID. If the above check fails, the receiver SHOULD log the event and MAY indicate via network management that a misconfiguration was detected. Here, "misconfiguration" word is used. We should not allow any misconfiguration in the network. So we can discard the packet. Then both routers will start acting as Master and now it is up to network administrator to resolve the misconfiguration. Thanks, Sreenatha Message: 1 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 03:41:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Sandhya Puppala <email@example.com> To: "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com> Subject: Re: [VRRP] vrrp Digest, Vol 88, Issue 2 Message-ID: <1382438484.49051.YahooMailNeo@web160102.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi Sreenatha, Thank you for your response. I agree with you. I also feel, both should be Master, but in RFC 5798. In section 7.1 If any one of the above checks fails, the receiver MUST discard the packet, SHOULD log the event, and MAY indicate via network management that an error occurred.? - MAY verify that "Count IPvX Addrs" and the list of IPvX address(es) match the IPvX Address(es) configured for the VRID. If the above check fails, the receiver SHOULD log the event and MAY indicate via network management that a misconfiguration was detected. It is not mentioned to drop the packet. In the same section for other failed cases it clearly mentioned to drop the packet. Please let me know your comments. Thanks,Sandhya Disclaimer : This email communication may contain privileged and confidential information and is intended for the use of the addressee only.If you are not an intended recipient you are requested not to reproduce, copy disseminate or in any manner distribute this email communication as the same is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the communication sent in error. Email communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure & error free and IB Technology is not liable for any errors in the email communication or for the proper, timely and complete transmission thereof.
- Re: [VRRP] : VRRP IPV6 Session Configuration with… Sreenatha Setty