Re: [VRRP] Plan to close the VRRP WG

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 10 June 2011 22:29 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: vrrp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vrrp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B27F21F859C for <vrrp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.003, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S3wDX3ADh3N4 for <vrrp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (asmtp4.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E8421F8599 for <vrrp@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5AMTExq031442 for <vrrp@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:29:14 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5AMTDeW031425 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <vrrp@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:29:13 +0100
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <vrrp@ietf.org>
References: <074601cc26f7$10f08ec0$32d1ac40$@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <074601cc26f7$10f08ec0$32d1ac40$@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:29:12 +0100
Message-ID: <0a4701cc27bd$d35643d0$7a02cb70$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIqK18WzHCuvp6CJUv6XkNT3LIr5ZP7JHqQ
Content-Language: en-gb
Subject: Re: [VRRP] Plan to close the VRRP WG
X-BeenThere: vrrp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol <vrrp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vrrp>, <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vrrp>
List-Post: <mailto:vrrp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp>, <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:29:22 -0000

Very wisely pointed out to me that I should also thank authors and chairs in
VRRP right the way back through history.

No slight intended, and it just goes to show how young I am :-)

Thanks to everyone who has participated in VRRP in any way.

Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: vrrp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:vrrp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Adrian Farrel
> Sent: 09 June 2011 23:46
> To: vrrp@ietf.org
> Subject: [VRRP] Plan to close the VRRP WG
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I plan to close the VRRP working group on Tuesday 14th.
> 
> The working group has done good work, and I think we should declare success,
> pat
> each other on the back, and move on.
> 
> In particular I want to thank Radia and Mukesh for their stewardship, and the
> authors and editors of the various documents for their work.
> 
> One I-D remains as work in progress: draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-mib. This I-D has
> been through MIB Doctor review, AD review and IETF last call. It is waiting
for
> a few final updates before it goes to t IESG for approval and on to the RFC
> Editor. We will move this to be AD-sponsored, and the document will go ahead
as
> normal.
> 
> I plan to leave the VRRP mailing list open for continued discussion of VRRP
> issues, and people with new I-Ds should raise them on the list before
requesting
> publication.
> 
> Thanks again,
> Adrian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> vrrp mailing list
> vrrp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp