IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VRRP] RFC5798 requires usage of RAs?

Stephen Nadas <stephen.nadas@ericsson.com> Thu, 28 April 2011 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.nadas@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: vrrp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vrrp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08CCDE0670 for <vrrp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:48:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IZ2DZtJehqEm for <vrrp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imr3.ericy.com (imr3.ericy.com [198.24.6.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0849EE067F for <vrrp@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eusaamw0711.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.178]) by imr3.ericy.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p3SHmf3i026360 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:48:42 -0500
Received: from EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.65]) by eusaamw0711.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.178]) with mapi; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:48:41 -0400
From: Stephen Nadas <stephen.nadas@ericsson.com>
To: Daniel Roesen <dr@cluenet.de>, "vrrp@ietf.org" <vrrp@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:48:40 -0400
Thread-Topic: [VRRP] RFC5798 requires usage of RAs?
Thread-Index: AcwFyI4+57w2MNduSAKo+TJ/LX6YcAAA87dQ
Message-ID: <450AE4BEC513614F96969DDA34F359341928928499@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se>
References: <20110415085709.GA3742@srv03.cluenet.de> <450AE4BEC513614F96969DDA34F35934192892832D@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se> <20110428171941.GA3937@srv03.cluenet.de>
In-Reply-To: <20110428171941.GA3937@srv03.cluenet.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [VRRP] RFC5798 requires usage of RAs?
X-BeenThere: vrrp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol <vrrp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vrrp>, <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vrrp>
List-Post: <mailto:vrrp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp>, <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:48:46 -0000

If you have cycles to propose text, that would be helpful, IMO. 
Thanks,
Steve  

-----Original Message-----
From: vrrp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:vrrp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Roesen
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 1:20 PM
To: vrrp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VRRP] RFC5798 requires usage of RAs?

Hi,

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:36:44AM -0400, Stephen Nadas wrote:
> Sorry for the delay.  I think the spec language could be better-
> (630) etc probably should have said something more like
> 
> "if ND RAs are in use, MUST send ND Router Advertisements for the virtual router. 

Indeed. Thanks for the confirmation.

My understanding of IETF procedures is, that an Errata submission would be possible, valid way to unambiguate that language - which is advisable to prevent further implementation confusion.

Shall I go ahead and draft up an erratum or do you want to take up on that yourself?

Best regards,
Daniel

--
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0 _______________________________________________
vrrp mailing list
vrrp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email