Re: [VRRP] What implementations exist of VRRP unified, and of MIB?

Vinoth Kumar Arumugam <vinothkumar.arumugam@gmail.com> Thu, 10 February 2011 16:05 UTC

Return-Path: <vinothkumar.arumugam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vrrp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vrrp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B753A6A1E for <vrrp@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:05:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 51AZuBrYzofE for <vrrp@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:05:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pz0-f66.google.com (mail-pz0-f66.google.com [209.85.210.66]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 143133A69FC for <vrrp@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:05:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so206413pzk.1 for <vrrp@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:05:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=zDOvqsTToS8qyhU4QbEpKHsCz/iWn2Knj7/yADTupCI=; b=gSq2dV/fltPehq3LG9khYGV3GNd1MJu1O4cUrpenhGTnt9bYADRuyDVLPKmb9ndGzX wE8qREC917+Qu3pLkQwZ8RJ1dsGDbPItF5MV1yCxkOl349T/9GMfrhyh7WLxEvZ0xowZ o0uE+nvVqHmJkKJjCcXmmy8iJ+hjGyxiBqHFk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=BBm6Hq6wLGx5gvT1unbYH+35xb7++5ijeCK5WvXHeJgydJRB/9UJa/JhJIouNgXerj ErxADM62IM0sAWET/yGVwznj6a1tiEwXDO5XdxvY14j2MrvVSg9hOSP7Q2FRaMpTov7o ODWUHlAVMySELqgcPYL+q2LT+OA0OXUhJBo7U=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.242.21 with SMTP id p21mr548161wfh.26.1297353915317; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:05:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.143.165.8 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:05:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinv42beygLdZ2Kz3Mj8rR6Nt0iROU4VCo7RbVak@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTinv42beygLdZ2Kz3Mj8rR6Nt0iROU4VCo7RbVak@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:05:15 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTikvB-+C4o9+HL3cLaU2KHMobsMoHu_S57Ggpq3X@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vinoth Kumar Arumugam <vinothkumar.arumugam@gmail.com>
To: Sergei Lissianoi <sergeilissianoi@gmail.com>, vrrp@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [VRRP] What implementations exist of VRRP unified, and of MIB?
X-BeenThere: vrrp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol <vrrp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp>, <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vrrp>
List-Post: <mailto:vrrp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp>, <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:05:04 -0000

Hi,

  Force10 has vrrp IPV6.

On 2/9/11, Sergei Lissianoi <sergeilissianoi@gmail.com>; wrote:
> Avaya Ethernet Routing Switch 8800 supports VRRP for IPv4 and IPv6. No
> support for draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-mib-08.txt though.
>
> -- Sergei
>
>>Subject: What implementations exist of VRRP unified, and of MIB?
>>From: Radia Perlman <radiaperlman at gmail.com>
>>Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:52:20 -0800
>
>> Are there implementations of unified VRRP, and MIB?
>>
>> (This is for the shepherd writeup for draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-mib-08.txt,
>> but it would also be good to know).
>>
>> Who has implementations of unified VRRP?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Radia
> _______________________________________________
> vrrp mailing list
> vrrp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device

Thanks
Vinoth Kumar Arumugam.
Force10 Networks India Pvt LTD
email - varumugam@force10networks.com