Re: [vwrap] about abstract type systems... llsd and dsd

Dzonatas Sol <> Tue, 03 May 2011 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B010E06B1 for <>; Tue, 3 May 2011 12:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z3KncHKj3e-7 for <>; Tue, 3 May 2011 12:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F07E067F for <>; Tue, 3 May 2011 12:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so208094pzk.31 for <>; Tue, 03 May 2011 12:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MDGYoLL1AZmD5i/QkOGKpATaejTxv8mCNIJmkt1XwH8=; b=YfBKlFhAWyrmtzHbEbdkHUbqSM9N834D1fUA7Q8rOuRgVpHLkI2/033B42dkXckUw9 SVx9AOjZqYWJjwM+eSo3QH8y1yVKW2J3t8N5EZsD3JDsPTFEgQMxJE/GvLwxw5+XHoir GvTi0RrVfbCxLgXSAlRGrlnIE8F3NrgT3FsE0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Xh2lXFEdsfRxCJYniXQkbxMMWcFlNeyGHPkeCOzQU8oKG406c6b+0hZleLxl2P6BgT LOSMoMPgPi7ldX3NfZwmjyjFX9WHScEb1dgiYWbs50xjoofoGh+EsKyBEjAXxaTRd0MP mIuS43FEwAkD+P0vdvK/GDmd9Bgh9vgH/Wr70=
Received: by with SMTP id z5mr232392pbm.450.1304449533340; Tue, 03 May 2011 12:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ([]) by with ESMTPS id r5sm202625pbe.101.2011. (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 03 May 2011 12:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 12:04:26 -0700
From: Dzonatas Sol <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv: Gecko/20110307 Icedove/3.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [vwrap] about abstract type systems... llsd and dsd
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 19:05:35 -0000

On 05/03/2011 07:25 AM, Meadhbh Hamrick wrote:
> so... when you write your VWRAP implementation, are you going to use
> LLSD or DSD. why? why not?

Already implemented LLSD last year and deployed. Wrote Snowglobe.Scalar 
in C# that implents LLSD read/write from buffers/streams and native C# 
usage in familar format as used in the Snowglobe/Snowstorm C++ source. 
The source is in Icesphere. Also already started to move Icesphere and 
my contributions for Snowglobe/Snowstorm to github (where we can fork 
together). Others can find VWRAP, LLSD, and the HTTP server in 
Snowglobe/Snowstorm with what I started as combined queries (what SPDY 
doesn't do) between frames.

I wrote my experience with pro/cons on this list that seemed unanswered. 
Have you looked at the LLIDL in my documentation and notice how the 
combined queries worked?

Noticed your last message here:

Further straw-man without implementation, I can't give you any yes or no 
answer on that. There's no specific IETF rule, yet demonstrated flow 
seems what other WGs expect.

--- ---
Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant