Re: [vwrap] Working Draft: SNOW-375

[Dzonatas Sol <[e-mail]>]

Dzonatas Sol wrote:
>
> I don't see how JSON is an improvement from that.
>
> --- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
> Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant
>
>

In fact, JSON's best feature is being able to do the eval(), yet those 
of us that written VMs should already know this. Verification killed 
that feature when they tried to use it in out-of-domain style.

On that note, I suggest to change the VWRAP docs where if people request 
JSON (i.e. "application/json-*" ) that they actually want RSS or ATOM 
styled structures. Instead, only offer RSS or ATOM structured JSON (i.e. 
"application/json-atom" ). If they want more raw than that, then it just 
makes sense to use XML. It's too costly for "us", and they don't realize it.

There may be other formats besides RSS or ATOM, so its not a moratorium, 
yet these two are popular solutions already well established. I'm sure 
different audiences are going to quibble, but I leave it up to you to 
decide on support steps to change and how to present them.

-- 
--- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant