Re: [vwrap] VWRAP, after discussion with the Area Director

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 11 May 2011 02:24 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3732E070A for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6AdTJkrZhQOk for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B1A9E06E3 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from squire.local (dsl-175-253.dynamic-dsl.frii.net [216.17.175.253]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21446400ED; Tue, 10 May 2011 20:24:47 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4DC9F366.30308@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 20:24:38 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <BANLkTim5WZP=LaE8iwH_YuJZVBeGZ3Qe1Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTim5WZP=LaE8iwH_YuJZVBeGZ3Qe1Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms060009040307080806030407"
Cc: vwrap@ietf.org, vwrap-ads@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vwrap] VWRAP, after discussion with the Area Director
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 02:24:49 -0000

Thanks, Barry.

Speaking as the Area Director responsible for the VWRAP WG, I'd like to
make it fully clear that we plan to proceed as follows:

1. Close the working group in its current instantiation

2. Keep the vwrap@ietf.org mailing list open

3. Continue discussions on the list

The hope is that folks here can converge on a new direction, leading to
formation of a new working group, or at least to publication of
individual Internet-Drafts that provide a framwork for future efforts.

Peter

On 5/10/11 7:12 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> I'm encouraged by Morgaine's assessment of the progress the group is
> making in discussions.  I like that it's taking a broader view,
> looking toward interoperation among different virtual worlds.  The
> discussion of the technology is going in a good direction.
> 
> Where it's going is to a very different place than what was set out in
> the VWRAP charter.  The IESG will need to re-evaluate the work when
> the group has things grounded and can propose a new charter, for the
> new direction.  They'll need to see who's invested in the new work --
> who will do the protocol design, who will take on the editing, and who
> will give it the review it needs to be a good standard.  In the
> meantime, this mailing list is the right place for the discussion to
> continue.
> 
> The IESG will close out the current charter, and will leave the
> mailing list open.  Remember that the IETF gets most of its work done
> on mailing lists, and not all of them are associated with current
> working groups.  There won't be chairs monitoring it... which means
> that there won't be chairs bugging you about IETF process stuff, but
> also that there won't be chairs nudging you along, so be careful not
> to let that stall the work.
> 
> I suggest that the group put its focus on converging on two initial documents:
> 
> 1. A new introduction and overview document, laying out what
> problems/situations/scenarios you'll be addressing, how you'll go
> about it, and what things will look like in the end.  This should lead
> directly to a proposal for a new charter.
> 
> 2. A protocol requirements document, specifying what the protocol(s)
> will have to do (and won't have to do).  This will be a strong basis
> for the protocol design, which could be done in that new working
> group.
> 
> Please keep this going.  I hope we'll see a charter proposal for a new
> working group fairly soon.
> 
> Barry, as chair
> _______________________________________________
> vwrap mailing list
> vwrap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap