Re: [vwrap] Removing first name / last name assumptions?

[Carlo Wood <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 09:02:10AM -0700, Meadhbh Hamrick wrote:
> okay. removing the two name option from the draft.

There is no need to remove the notion of "agentID" versus
"accountID" I think. Both are thus different that I can
imagine there is the need for an overlap period, or else
indeed very specific encoding would be needed(?) for the
one-string.

[ Perhaps it should be noted however that in theory it
is possible to use the one string as a custom xml message
in itself (like Dzontas example).

This would fall completely outside the realm of VWRAP,
but it does raise the question of there really is a need
for two different types of login strings in VWRAP therefore.

The string, as defined in VWRAP, could contain (as defined by
whoever the provider is) for example:

<type>agentID</type>
<first>Firstname</first>
<last>Lastname</last>,

or

<type>accountID</type>
<ID>[e-mail]</ID>

or any encoding a provider wishes.]

I am assuming you mean that in the draft agentID will be
a single string, just like accountID?

-- 
Carlo Wood <[e-mail]>