IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vwrap] The <embed> tag... is the group still interested in LLSD or DSD?

Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com> Sun, 08 May 2011 23:15 UTC

Return-Path: <dzonatas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE18E0684 for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 May 2011 16:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.915
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.915 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.316, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 83YIYjadVA94 for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 May 2011 16:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pv0-f172.google.com (mail-pv0-f172.google.com [74.125.83.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A5EBE0651 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 May 2011 16:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pvh1 with SMTP id 1so2867506pvh.31 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Sun, 08 May 2011 16:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7g/Oo3V+tmFLmqM27YoTJI20XGbhAfMkIO5RI56PLK4=; b=w7pDG+ZgSR1t7KL6CSyVV1tU1jVcLq1X+UwJwAaKs/GW1ofSJJWgkMm3cILB8nZNTw DsfpcOJ9ggcEJRRVOFHGU2hOGSD5oNUx5AnbRrgz2OaIzTXJ/d/ds6Opvy3yOOh+jkjj DWajZowo4b26FU7WTjVsaK6bjG83sPdkfa/jg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fO9hKGQmsvwlXYD2P9JA7GilltV335poPEVixk9jVR0iG64osmlwPE/lgqiHxdw0Kp BIMbEZRctqEqlrTIDb9mlEuIgdTOs8xvufC2ChP5VoYdvnJ2U3tuqtGj3Ah7byQDH4B5 lXIhbdZKc/gfasjtQeCOUtIbPXkZ+WvbQLWIw=
Received: by 10.68.38.42 with SMTP id d10mr7590631pbk.58.1304892855218; Sun, 08 May 2011 15:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.50] (adsl-70-133-70-225.dsl.scrm01.sbcglobal.net [70.133.70.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f5sm3298654pbt.92.2011.05.08.15.14.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 08 May 2011 15:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4DC7157C.9090705@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 15:13:16 -0700
From: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110307 Icedove/3.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTi=g9T5q5bVgytpxRxuE=Oc9iG2F9w@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1A8C9.9090406@gmail.com> <BANLkTikkOS34CC+ML0JNJgHDoRqbs9rY9w@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1D165.7010705@gmail.com> <4DC1D5FC.6040608@gmail.com> <BANLkTik81Eht3NTdLXXmgqOWvjc2s_KBnw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=-heHa35w43te0ba8NufkT+MP+CQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTin6ExR7+xpodbtoTAS_4WyhUXL92Q@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikjKib79_rLR_s2X=X-ss-+V_yw+w@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTim4aY7oNALbOfZ2V-htivVmQJZDiA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=7MDUAfjJb697uRwrrxB-4v5fQ3A@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=AeC1oLNGFwUWs0Yp_JNEKcaSsag@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinNtJiq4JH5qvf36kiKmFtAQArvAA@mail.gmail.com> <4DC60610.3040606@gmail.com> <BANLkTinwSxG3=3eSnKjvFSB1k7fYOEKwPg@mail.gmail.com> <4DC61E3C.5080307@gmail.com> <BANLkTin=tyc+rUy=RvqCJ9r34j90v1nSGg@mail.gmail.com> <4DC6840B.9050203@gmail.com> <BANLkTinE87mmqLZyqgzWsEfi9cOk2br2nQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DC6BB19.1050305@gmail.com> <BANLkTim+CUYNNdxALF2W1+E5Vmj20Ar7tw@mail.gmail.com> <4DC6D343.4090202@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DC6D343.4090202@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: vwrap@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vwrap] The <embed> tag... is the group still interested in LLSD or DSD?
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 23:15:34 -0000

Note, thinking-out-of-the-box discussion about hetero-generous region 
hubs. Besides the <embed> tag, there still is need for presence in the 
secondary region where the are assets are actually left in the original 
region.

Please stay tune while we/they... unplug off-list and plug-in Monday's 
asset.

SDLC... I vote to add (indeterminate named) multi-cast ability to such 
plug-in regions in the charter. The constraint is more obvious 
connections and update-frames of such regional topology. I think 
'regional media extensions' is more in scope than abstract client-side 
media extension. Should we assume such media extensions are out of scope?

On 05/08/2011 10:30 AM, Dzonatas Sol wrote:
>
> On 05/08/2011 09:57 AM, Morgaine wrote:
>> It has to meet important engineering requirements, and the big ones 
>> are flexibility, extensibility, and scalability, plus the efficiency 
>> that everybody needs.�
>
> (previously) "I don't know what you mean by "scale" here."
>
>
> BIG technical topic: "scalability" versus "scale" versus "scalar".
>
>
>
>> Licenses have nothing to do with this.� And stick to technical topics 
>> please.
>
>
> Again, start with the solution.  SLDC....
>


-- 
--- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email