IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vwrap] one question

Crista Lopes <lopes@ics.uci.edu> Fri, 24 September 2010 20:16 UTC

Return-Path: <lopes@ics.uci.edu>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 519903A6A45 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:16:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.413
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.413 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.185, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IDJmZVTIgYF8 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from david-tennant-v0.ics.uci.edu (david-tennant-v0.ics.uci.edu [128.195.1.174]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BABC83A6A8B for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [169.234.6.38] (susan-foreman.ics.uci.edu [128.195.1.134]) (authenticated bits=0) by david-tennant-v0.ics.uci.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8OKGvVD004258 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:16:58 -0700
Message-ID: <4C9D073B.3030303@ics.uci.edu>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:16:59 -0700
From: Crista Lopes <lopes@ics.uci.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vwrap@ietf.org
References: <4C9AB1BB.2010008@ics.uci.edu> <AANLkTi=fz6LhpRaTJr7Bu4KsXS93-B0B7SzjH4PwDGuc@mail.gmail.com> <4C9B7041.50908@ics.uci.edu> <AANLkTim-BvM-z90DjRcXD1r1bvZ1doSxzq6-Ou4jg-V7@mail.gmail.com> <B404AC53EB6E4A90A58B2C606CF66045@TWEEDY64> <AANLkTim98XGBrUQOVs0a1iyJD5AOq9nBPhcbZYgU6tro@mail.gmail.com> <4C9BAFF4.5010702@ics.uci.edu> <AANLkTinaghw0KwwvCQn8sEE5787C5zvdvt0Mos_qvByA@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimTV2g__Bmr9vexgKy5OjDubrjqFj-7Foe6nSGW@mail.gmail.com> <4C9CBFF5.2000508@ics.uci.edu> <OF86D28401.33705A10-ON852577A8.006059AE-852577A8.00654907@us.ibm.com> <4C9CF6F2.4040905@ics.uci.edu> <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933D012AD7DF4E@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> <4C9D03A1.1070603@ics.uci.edu> <AANLkTikpQqC6bxURejyUesUu5LqRNtx3wT=6rqp28sWN@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikpQqC6bxURejyUesUu5LqRNtx3wT=6rqp28sWN@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020206010308040302030103"
X-ICS-MailScanner-Information: Please send mail to helpdesk@ics.uci.edu or more information
X-ICS-MailScanner-ID: o8OKGvVD004258
X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1.439, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00)
X-ICS-MailScanner-From: lopes@ics.uci.edu
Subject: Re: [vwrap] one question
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 20:16:36 -0000

On 9/24/2010 1:14 PM, Morgaine wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Crista Lopes <lopes@ics.uci.edu 
> <mailto:lopes@ics.uci.edu>> wrote:
>
>
>     On 9/24/2010 12:38 PM, Hurliman, John wrote:
>
>         Have we suddenly removed the need for all web standards other
>         than a method of fetching Javascript blobs and executing them?
>
>
>     Of course not.
>     It just seems very odd that *web-based virtual worlds* that want
>     to interoperate need to follow some standard for sending the
>     assets to the clients. This just doesn't seem related to
>     interoperability between independently-operated virtual worlds.
>     They way I do it and the way you do it doesn't seem related to our
>     ability to send our users to each other's world.
>
>
> Crista, to help this discussion become more technical, could you 
> please define "*web-based virtual worlds*" for us, in sufficient 
> technical detail to allow us to distinguish them from the much better 
> known types of virtual world such as those we build from OpenSimulator?

I already did, but here it goes one more time: virtual worlds that use 
the web browser as the client component.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email