IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vwrap] The <embed> tag... is the group still interested in LLSD or DSD?

"Robert G. Jakabosky" <bobby@sharedrealm.com> Mon, 09 May 2011 07:12 UTC

Return-Path: <bobby@sharedrealm.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCC2E06F6 for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 May 2011 00:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id njC1IuK3NtzO for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 May 2011 00:12:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.neoawareness.com (mail.neoawareness.com [67.223.232.27]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A45E062A for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 May 2011 00:12:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=neo.localnet) by mail.neoawareness.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bobby@sharedrealm.com>) id 1QJKeB-0005uZ-17 for vwrap@ietf.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 07:12:51 +0000
From: "Robert G. Jakabosky" <bobby@sharedrealm.com>
To: vwrap@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 00:12:49 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; )
References: <BANLkTi=g9T5q5bVgytpxRxuE=Oc9iG2F9w@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTin=tyc+rUy=RvqCJ9r34j90v1nSGg@mail.gmail.com> <4DC6840B.9050203@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DC6840B.9050203@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201105090012.50031.bobby@sharedrealm.com>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bobby@sharedrealm.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.neoawareness.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Subject: Re: [vwrap] The <embed> tag... is the group still interested in LLSD or DSD?
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 07:12:54 -0000

On Sunday 08, Dzonatas Sol wrote:
> If that alone is too hard to comprehend, then your "designing for the
> future" ignores complete backward compatibility and the many
> implementations that already exist.

-1

Why should VWRAP keep backwards compatibility to anything when we haven't even 
published a standard yet.  The current LLSD spec is a draft and not set in 
stone.  Current LLSD implementations may have to change before this 
standardization process is finished.

-- 
Robert G. Jakabosky

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email