Re: [vwrap] one question
David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com> Thu, 23 September 2010 16:22 UTC
Return-Path: <dwl@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 348E73A6A9C; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:22:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.504
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.094,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ecyNQVKu3qJF;
Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com (e5.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.145]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9CF3A69E4;
Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (d01relay05.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.237])
by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o8NG3V3k030465;
Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:03:31 -0400
Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by
d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o8NGNR1k119484;
Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:23:27 -0400
Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by
d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id
o8NGNQpx019401; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:23:27 -0400
Received: from d01mc605.pok.ibm.com (d01mc605.pok.ibm.com [9.63.9.192]) by
d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id
o8NGNQUZ019387; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:23:26 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4C9AB1BB.2010008@ics.uci.edu>
References: <4C9AB1BB.2010008@ics.uci.edu>
X-KeepSent: 0CB2773C:B18DC261-852577A7:00597653; type=4; name=$KeepSent
To: lopes@ics.uci.edu
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.1FP1 SHF20 February 10, 2010
Message-ID: <OF0CB2773C.B18DC261-ON852577A7.00597653-852577A7.005A0946@us.ibm.com>
From: David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:23:26 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01MC605/01/M/IBM(Release
8.0.2FP4|December 10, 2009) at 09/23/2010 12:23:26
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
Boundary="0__=0ABBFD34DFCAF0C38f9e8a93df938690918c0ABBFD34DFCAF0C3"
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: "vwrap@ietf.org" <vwrap@ietf.org>, vwrap-bounces@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vwrap] one question
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group
<vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>,
<mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>,
<mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:22:59 -0000
The very phrase protocol endpoint rather gives the answer. VWRAP describes how to request things be done, and how data is delivered in response to those requests. What the requester does with the data is out of scope, There are descriptions about what the delivered data "means" but, that merely means that, just like a web page, if you request a page, parse it and then generate subsequent requests based on a faulty or confused understanding of the delivered data your subsequent requests are likely to be poorly formed, and generate error replied. Likewise if you request things of a VWRAP service and build odd requests based on that, the VWRAP service will likely be confused by those subsequent requests. (And being largely stateless REST services will happily say huh in the expected way) - David ~ Zha vwrap-bounces@ietf.org wrote on 09/22/2010 09:47:39 PM: > From: > > Cristina Videira Lopes <lopes@ics.uci.edu> > > To: > > "vwrap@ietf.org" <vwrap@ietf.org> > > Date: > > 09/22/2010 09:48 PM > > Subject: > > [vwrap] one question > > Sent by: > > vwrap-bounces@ietf.org > > Let me summarize my main puzzlement with the drafts, and with some of > the things stated here, with one very simple yes/no question that, > hopefully, the group will get to a consensus in no time: > > I have a student starting to work on a JavaScript+HTML5 viewer for > brain-dead-simple, multi-user, OpenSimulator-served scenes. I can do > that very easily with OpenSim, since the client protocol is a plugin. Is > VWRAP set up to develop protocols for interoperability between virtual > worlds that, like these ones, use the web browser as the client? > a) Yes > b) No > > People's answers? > > _______________________________________________ > vwrap mailing list > vwrap@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
- [vwrap] one question Cristina Videira Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Jonathan Freedman
- Re: [vwrap] one question Hurliman, John
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine
- [vwrap] Fwd: one question Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [vwrap] one question Cristina Videira Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question David W Levine
- [vwrap] End point "behavior" (was: one question) Boroondas Gupte
- Re: [vwrap] End point "behavior" (was: one questi… Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [vwrap] End point "behavior" (was: one questi… Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [vwrap] End point "behavior" Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] End point "behavior" Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [vwrap] one question kevin.tweedy
- Re: [vwrap] one question kevin.tweedy
- Re: [vwrap] one question Mike Dickson
- Re: [vwrap] End point "behavior" Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] End point "behavior" Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] one question kevin.tweedy
- Re: [vwrap] End point "behavior" Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] End point "behavior" Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] one question David W Levine
- [vwrap] Cautionary thought... David W Levine
- Re: [vwrap] one question Sean Hennessee
- Re: [vwrap] one question Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] one question Cristina Videira Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question David W Levine
- [vwrap] Constructive Progress David W Levine
- Re: [vwrap] one question Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Mike Dickson
- Re: [vwrap] one question Hurliman, John
- Re: [vwrap] one question Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] one question Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] one question Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] one question Hurliman, John
- Re: [vwrap] one question Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Hurliman, John
- Re: [vwrap] one question Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] one question Hurliman, John
- Re: [vwrap] one question Sean Hennessee
- Re: [vwrap] one question Sean Hennessee
- Re: [vwrap] one question Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] one question Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] one question Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine