Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a web browser?
SM <sm@resistor.net> Sun, 19 December 2010 22:32 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id DC93F3A692F for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>;
Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:32:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.526
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.526 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.073,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NNJvHfFhj162 for
<vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:32:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111263A692E for <vwrap@ietf.org>;
Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:32:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net ([10.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by
ns1.qubic.net (8.14.5.Alpha0/8.14.5.Alpha0) with ESMTP id oBJMXjxL026502
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:33:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010;
t=1292798035; x=1292884435; bh=XDEQU/bCTBGtC/iT/e2wsAPU7vCL3LvXKk/e/bQStqo=;
h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc;
b=N1sd2An337QkaQagFsO1s8OzYUkn0r+uycIe7Gj1gSgXE+AbnpGGHfl/JUleRw/Wn
hYw5W5DRim/4fNsyQFXKEuSC5eeAcut9LtLHkXJc2ohYTp4ONIjidWLNOUyygBaVyC
4CDYuGIYmEn6/dlRWhmolz8vocIOTYqi7Ku+W44c=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail;
t=1292798035; x=1292884435; bh=XDEQU/bCTBGtC/iT/e2wsAPU7vCL3LvXKk/e/bQStqo=;
h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc;
b=QZcZuLo7s+/1cRlBEQUeEbULZxLRw7xivG2e/h3cvQCFK5DUsF2REvioeN1SzPq0B
SvvoHON+mrxGH2oq6V8jy9CFYRWHUAH2HScjvQKcXcwDmnUBgWDmmVRMRsjOE6i93k
IDavbVCYwQBY0SWJQSa/1wvttK61ZC0oNODsS0X4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns;
b=tuxsoF20tkHTsAvryr02UP3He29nLkK7xRjLG8pbepwumIycSpAeI5GJs/pMBMjSn
kp3ydjIzE8KgKaQ5nUn0b7ikNCBZ7+8dxxr4EzSVofYHiiPFZqDRXnnUV0ovtyMuCkR
68mULPQHBnzXgsGtSd4d8NQqWtYBCZfSi9aXjc8=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20101219141829.0a381da8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:22:04 -0800
To: Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikFWUxQyT9aNFBk7-Fdb5bNdFT9Bj-dehqVP0WN@mail.gmail.c om>
References: <AANLkTintjQdAS=EWfiRu3oWenB42LKsNzJPDJ+5ofBRO@mail.gmail.com>
<AANLkTinhWObg6Te2VtGYKXsxBG5=gVDS5szmjtLeOgnm@mail.gmail.com>
<AANLkTikYn-iA7osXT_oW8rL61GhK57pp7uJVmTSGVvj7@mail.gmail.com>
<AANLkTikFWUxQyT9aNFBk7-Fdb5bNdFT9Bj-dehqVP0WN@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: vwrap@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a web browser?
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group
<vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>,
<mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>,
<mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 22:32:05 -0000
Hi Joshua, At 09:07 16-12-10, Joshua Bell wrote: > * Net: WebSockets is not stabilized yet and does not offer UDP > (which may be necessary for some low-latency scenarios); further, > cross-platform Is there any interest for UDP support in Websockets? Regards, -sm
- [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a web br… Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Dahlia Trimble
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Joshua Bell
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… JohnnyB Hammerer
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… peter host
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Brian Hurley
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Cristina Videira Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… peter host
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… SM
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Dahlia Trimble
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Hurliman, John
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Mic Bowman
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Dahlia Trimble
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Dan Olivares
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Dahlia Trimble
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Dan Olivares
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Joshua Bell
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Dahlia Trimble
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Dahlia Trimble
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Dzonatas Sol
- Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a we… Dzonatas Sol