[vwrap] Interest in VWRAP Session at IETF79 (Beijing)

Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com> Mon, 27 September 2010 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <josh@lindenlab.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A51D3A6C09 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.674
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.674 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.302, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d+7hMczwgAHr for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EECF23A6B6F for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so5556879wyi.31 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.151.83 with SMTP id b19mr6511242wbw.205.1285611293433; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.148.89 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:14:53 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikRDe84nFFqYC4UNGOOvE_hkEU6CzpHaPwm69_n@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
To: vwrap@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e649c86876e0e9049141b467"
Subject: [vwrap] Interest in VWRAP Session at IETF79 (Beijing)
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:14:18 -0000

(as chair)

The deadline for requesting a Working Group session at IETF 79 in Beijing is
today.

There's certainly lots of discussion on the VWRAP list at the moment; we
seem to be in a phase of stepping back and revisiting the decisions that led
to the chartering of the group. I'm unsure if we're approaching consensus on
directions (new or old), but I admit to being a bit behind in my e-mail
processing.

Are there WG participants that are planning to attend the Beijing IETF
meeting who would want a VWRAP session and can propose agenda items that
could gain a fair amount of closure at such a meeting?

It does seem like we would benefit greatly from the high bandwidth/low
latency capabilities of a face-to-face meeting, especially at this juncture.
On the other hand, I'm not sure of the abilities of most of the WG
contributors to attend. (I don't believe I would be able to attend, for
example.)

If you'll be attending, please speak up.

Joshua