Subject: Re: [vwrap] SPDY
From: Dan Olivares <[email-masked]>
To: Dzonatas Sol <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:48:50 -0400
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>

It would be nice if they could push that through the IETF.

-Dan

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Dzonatas Sol <[email-masked]> wrote:
> White paper: http://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-whitepaper
>
> Dzonatas Sol wrote:
>>
>> Seems like GOOGLE did something similar to what I did with "bidirectional"
>> ReSTful combines, and they called it SPDY.
>>
>> (read about SPDY near the bottom)
>>
>> http://www.conceivablytech.com/6696/products/google-chrome-gets-spdy-and-an-onscreen-keyboard
>>
>> >> Google said that it saw pageload times to improve by 44 to up to 64%.
>> >> According to the company, SPDY still uses HTTP methods, headers and “other
>> >> semantics.” <<
>>
>> The difference is chrome implements a modified HTTP stack (SPDY) instead
>> of being limited to HTTP itself. So far, I only see a BSD style denotation
>> placed on the source files.
>>
>> Maybe worthwhile to investigate to see how easy it is to add the
>> ReSTful/LLSD/LLIDL combines and secure the transport within any specified
>> trust domain.
>>
>
>
> --
> --- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
> Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant
>
> _______________________________________________
> vwrap mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
>