Re: [vwrap] Moving startup documents into the working group

My Yes/No responses (discussion to follow in a different thread):

> Introduction and Goals - yes
> Trust Model and User Authentication - yes
> Abstract Type System - yes
> Client Application Launch Message - no
> Foundation - no

Morgaine.

============================================

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Barry Leiba <
barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com> wrote:

> It's time to think about which pre-WG documents the working group is
> ready to adopt.  As I introduce this, I want to stress that adoption
> of documents does NOT mean that the group has consensus on the current
> content of those documents, that it collectively agrees with what they
> say, that the documents are in any sense "ready".  All it means is
> that the working group thinks they're headed in the right direction,
> and can be used as a starting point for further refinement.  Indeed,
> documents adopted as starting points by the working group might have a
> number of significant revisions before they are declared "ready" and
> are sent to the IESG.
>
> That said, the chairs would like to take a poll on whether the
> following are ready for adoption on their next revisions:
>
> * Introduction and Goals
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hamrick-vwrap-intro-01
>
> * Trust Model and User Authentication
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hamrick-vwrap-authentication-01
>
> * Abstract Type System for the Transmission of Dynamic Structured Data
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hamrick-vwrap-type-system-00
>
> * Client Application Launch Message
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hamrick-vwrap-launch-00
>
> * Foundation
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lentczner-vwrap-foundation-00
>
>
> Please reply in this thread as in this example, listing each document
> and giving your opinion:
> > Introduction and Goals - yes
> > Trust Model and User Authentication - yes
> > Abstract Type System - yes
> > Client Application Launch Message - yes
> > Foundation - yes
>
> Please make your opinion either "yes" (the working group should adopt
> the document) or "no" (the working group should not adopt the
> document).
>
> Please do not discuss anything else in this thread.  If you need to
> discuss your answer, please start a new thread, with a new subject
> line, for the discussion.  If you have any issues you prefer to bring
> to the chairs off-list, contact us at <vwrap-chairs@tools.ietf.org>rg>.
>
> Thanks very much.
>
> -- Barry, as chair
> _______________________________________________
> vwrap mailing list
> vwrap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
>