[vwrap] #18: Review serialization conformance requirements
"vwrap issue tracker" <trac@tools.ietf.org> Wed, 31 March 2010 21:52 UTC
Return-Path: <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 375513A6AD8 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>;
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.135
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-100.135 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.154, BAYES_05=-1.11,
DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k3DYFUyzgh-d for
<vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2a])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF973A6A40 for <vwrap@ietf.org>;
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by
zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from
<trac@tools.ietf.org>) id 1Nx5qX-0006AZ-5d; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:53:09 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: "vwrap issue tracker" <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.11.6
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.11.6, by Edgewall Software
To: markl@lindenlab.com
X-Trac-Project: vwrap
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:53:09 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/vwrap/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/vwrap/trac/ticket/18
Message-ID: <059.67506bdcef79210329005771c9f766ab@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 18
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: markl@lindenlab.com, vwrap@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org);
SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:56:10 -0700
Cc: vwrap@ietf.org
Subject: [vwrap] #18: Review serialization conformance requirements
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Reply-To: trac@localhost.amsl.com
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group
<vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>,
<mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>,
<mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:52:38 -0000
#18: Review serialization conformance requirements
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Reporter: markl@… | Owner: markl@…
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Version: | Severity: -
Keywords: Foundation |
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Foundation currently requires all implementations to support both XML and
JSON encodings. This seems to me like we avoided the difficult choice by
equally burdening everyone. In practice, some systems don't support
multiple encodings -- and it might be difficult for some to (JavaScript
running in a browser, say), it isn't clear this was the best choice. On
the other hand, implementing both of these is pretty easy in most
environments since XML and JSON parsers are plentiful.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/vwrap/trac/ticket/18>
vwrap <http://tools.ietf.org/vwrap/>
- [vwrap] #18: Review serialization conformance req… vwrap issue tracker