IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vwrap] one question

Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com> Fri, 24 September 2010 20:13 UTC

Return-Path: <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932863A6A58 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.765
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.765 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.211, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rGk43UFy6uD7 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6933A69D9 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qwc9 with SMTP id 9so2330210qwc.31 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=AiLVsUfAH6BWirKg1U7tHGVizJteUX6MYdopPx10f1M=; b=iBHskslcRB4H9OrNMru2MnkIxKn976CIPYl72j1YF5kEkze5M40Eu02kXEEAMb5WIb SBp9oskoZMX06YxUBEAD+YRdvLJSUBBcMhrLjbEk3N8E/D+sGLT+V/OftZLRZ6n5tGUQ xf9+W496xWIiy3+XbD+MI0Z+T/LwfGfBwqdQw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=RoNPGRBk3V8wmhMST2Ki9ugfg26FrtusQbsvrJm0h6ynddCW5hSK9N/OAxYcjsAfvX Be6yfVgxRCOiPBGJvTvdg51hEQVXwnZrUGDNX/MqoiJVKyL1m+0uWZxsYiB/j/aYtKJr 6Rfw1LoBLXFDtccEVmI8iMWBLLLUuAvObcPmk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.185.137 with SMTP id co9mr2928332qcb.189.1285359244415; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.232.69 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4C9D03A1.1070603@ics.uci.edu>
References: <4C9AB1BB.2010008@ics.uci.edu> <AANLkTi=fz6LhpRaTJr7Bu4KsXS93-B0B7SzjH4PwDGuc@mail.gmail.com> <4C9B7041.50908@ics.uci.edu> <AANLkTim-BvM-z90DjRcXD1r1bvZ1doSxzq6-Ou4jg-V7@mail.gmail.com> <B404AC53EB6E4A90A58B2C606CF66045@TWEEDY64> <AANLkTim98XGBrUQOVs0a1iyJD5AOq9nBPhcbZYgU6tro@mail.gmail.com> <4C9BAFF4.5010702@ics.uci.edu> <AANLkTinaghw0KwwvCQn8sEE5787C5zvdvt0Mos_qvByA@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimTV2g__Bmr9vexgKy5OjDubrjqFj-7Foe6nSGW@mail.gmail.com> <4C9CBFF5.2000508@ics.uci.edu> <OF86D28401.33705A10-ON852577A8.006059AE-852577A8.00654907@us.ibm.com> <4C9CF6F2.4040905@ics.uci.edu> <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933D012AD7DF4E@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> <4C9D03A1.1070603@ics.uci.edu>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:14:04 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTikpQqC6bxURejyUesUu5LqRNtx3wT=6rqp28sWN@mail.gmail.com>
From: Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
To: vwrap@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b87d42c22980491070575
Subject: Re: [vwrap] one question
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 20:13:40 -0000

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Crista Lopes <lopes@ics.uci.edu> wrote:

>
> On 9/24/2010 12:38 PM, Hurliman, John wrote:
>
>> Have we suddenly removed the need for all web standards other than a
>> method of fetching Javascript blobs and executing them?
>>
>
> Of course not.
> It just seems very odd that *web-based virtual worlds* that want to
> interoperate need to follow some standard for sending the assets to the
> clients. This just doesn't seem related to interoperability between
> independently-operated virtual worlds. They way I do it and the way you do
> it doesn't seem related to our ability to send our users to each other's
> world.
>
>
Crista, to help this discussion become more technical, could you please
define "*web-based virtual worlds*" for us, in sufficient technical detail
to allow us to distinguish them from the much better known types of virtual
world such as those we build from OpenSimulator?


Morgaine.





============================

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Crista Lopes <lopes@ics.uci.edu> wrote:

>
> On 9/24/2010 12:38 PM, Hurliman, John wrote:
>
>> Have we suddenly removed the need for all web standards other than a
>> method of fetching Javascript blobs and executing them?
>>
>
> Of course not.
> It just seems very odd that web-based virtual worlds that want to
> interoperate need to follow some standard for sending the assets to the
> clients. This just doesn't seem related to interoperability between
> independently-operated virtual worlds. They way I do it and the way you do
> it doesn't seem related to our ability to send our users to each other's
> world.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> vwrap mailing list
> vwrap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email