IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vwrap] xml-org-ietf-vwrap- Re: Working Draft: SNOW-375

Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com> Thu, 05 August 2010 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <dzonatas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEC33A6B15 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 06:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.194
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.194 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.405, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HOA2N82iXtQT for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 06:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2BF53A6AF6 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 06:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk6 with SMTP id 6so2804934pzk.31 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 06:12:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eNj99GA7z40CaqqqBdaZirZ9eVovPanYhyciuB8Em5I=; b=wQGoaz9937GZgd9uxo3LV3Z0lDkq7/gM1lzBxHIgzN+7un46Pw5YCYN/OWdM51rs65 SgL0xXjpOsncrE3M7rRqB9WcClkrU1Hu53qv4Wwbhgnby4MN/pVYjPDXX7eHhlUGI7xF LxLTJB325Wz81RjIfRYad9WzlLRs6D6mYFrbU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jawj01glKRikgrcn53iTACCaMmU7LUxoGCbyOtrfr0WOMQKoiPn2bkF9FgWem/lTC7 Te+diokSSWL/HBaSfNQ4WAcSY2Z65HX31wqnVX8AFpXl1kVzaRKuTGUTVyKpaSqKP/Z0 sjaculNIvS31g6mf6gy58H6FndW23bUrrvTHg=
Received: by 10.142.50.19 with SMTP id x19mr9105012wfx.128.1281013931384; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 06:12:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.50] (adsl-68-124-103-250.dsl.scrm01.pacbell.net [68.124.103.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y16sm186085wff.14.2010.08.05.06.12.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 05 Aug 2010 06:12:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C5ABBA5.6040307@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 06:24:53 -0700
From: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100329)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
References: <4C542CAC.1090301@gmail.com> <AANLkTinLVdcwHGWWuXztN6EnBA5jL56iaRvX9pR54vOX@mail.gmail.com> <4C572A6E.8070905@gmail.com> <AANLkTik1ukKWhNcJ0TgWfREf0YCd_oLutcxk8_j4b+=e@mail.gmail.com> <4C573C43.5060905@gmail.com> <4C58443F.80502@gmail.com> <4C584C52.6040309@gmail.com> <4C5967C6.4080501@gmail.com> <4646639E08F58B42836FAC24C94624DD85E085CDAE@GVW0433EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net> <4C5A0D0F.6070900@gmail.com> <4C5A1956.8090401@gmail.com> <4C5A2332.4060405@gmail.com> <4C5AA99A.8040800@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C5AA99A.8040800@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "vwrap@ietf.org" <vwrap@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [vwrap] xml-org-ietf-vwrap- Re: Working Draft: SNOW-375
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:11:43 -0000

Dzonatas Sol wrote:
> ..it could be written in kids books.

If you wondering what I am doing here in this mail-list besides 
Icesphere and VWRAP, then there is overall issue about spam.

After I reviewed all the different scheme to secure hosts and different 
HELO styles, I thought... the answer is right here. Just filter out the 
general mime types, and there is no need to encapsulate or move to 
something else besides RFC822.  Most likely then the headers could be 
minimized and the specific ones moves to there own mime-type, and you 
probably get the general idea.

On that note, I also suggested in AWG yesterday a V + USB device. Maybe 
a mime-type like  "application/xml-org-ietf-vwrap-v+usb"  just to show 
it is  enabled compared to a V - USB that is similar to a DTD version.

Hyperintraconnect that and we've sublimed a step.


-- 
--- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email