Re: [vwrap] Removing first name / last name assumptions?

Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com> Tue, 06 April 2010 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <josh@lindenlab.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE83E3A6811 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 08:51:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.625
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.625 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ByvVk04z4xIR for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 08:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90453A67AE for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 08:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gyh4 with SMTP id 4so3531gyh.31 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 08:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.144.11 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 08:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4BBB4D6E.60600@gmail.com>
References: <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933DCB738C13@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> <t2jb325928b1004051220i5f1d8f04od2602f26f758f3da@mail.gmail.com> <CDB96FF3-A282-40B3-94D8-A9B6A00D8AF5@bbn.com> <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933DCB738C9B@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> <y2gb325928b1004051307u5f5e64d9zd18b70bfd8307d6a@mail.gmail.com> <y2h6c9fcc2a1004052132z77168acaq26928209fa1e3e03@mail.gmail.com> <4BBB45FA.8050408@gmail.com> <j2yb325928b1004060728n29284d7fvd848fc545d54ead9@mail.gmail.com> <4BBB4D6E.60600@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 08:51:50 -0700
Received: by 10.150.174.9 with SMTP id w9mr7880320ybe.0.1270569110633; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 08:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <x2zf72742de1004060851rfb49f5ep823a868c345ffb64@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
To: vwrap@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd573d2807ddc0483936c05
Subject: Re: [vwrap] Removing first name / last name assumptions?
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:51:56 -0000

Speaking for Linden:

(1) For the purposes of VWRAP interop, it is acceptable to us to assume that
a human readable agent identifier ("name") for Second Life can be coerced to
and from a single string field. Today, SL firstname/lastname pairs are
constrained to a subset of ASCII that disallows characters such as periods
and spaces. Therefore, as has been mentioned, it is possible today to
unambiguously encode an SL name as (firstname + "." + lastname) or
(firstname + " " + lastname).

(2) As mentioned at
https://blogs.secondlife.com/community/features/blog/2010/01/03/happy-new-year-looking-backlooking-ahead
and
at
https://blogs.secondlife.com/community/features/blog/2010/01/22/will-the-real-you-please-stand-up
Linden
is investigating modifications to "names" in SL. However, it is too early to
comment on any details at this time.

(3) That said, the investigative work for (2) is being done with the
benefits of (1) held firmly in mind. (As with practically anything in the
biz, this statement is not a contract or guarantee.)

Therefore, from Linden's perspective, we can live with the proposed
simplified requirements of a single string. If it becomes necessary to
revisit that in the future we'll raise it.