Re: [vwrap] what's wrong with starting small?

Meadhbh Hamrick <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com> Wed, 22 September 2010 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D34813A6A3E for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.058
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.058 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.301, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_LWSHORTT=1.24]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Te7kPOyWRe3j for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10CD3A6978 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwb18 with SMTP id 18so466330wwb.1 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=3ZMk9CFPjoP2nfDzpVZReatew/v5CaW6U3kpXixkwSs=; b=IKDm+t9EkT32Ogs1tqwA+eF5TlpXN2tRODjzZk882uxDVL/fryyZHoLAlS8Dw8Iuu/ OYbujHDVBXPZBgqprkRTBDgrr0O+Mbnhr4jUw0WisYW0fMykc4Ru5W5CvuvidAZNRPUZ OQ9fZMZ4v7V3FrLGTUL1sfsAQkFz9URiLjEC4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=khNXg2xJFDUw6lne8+r/XKI/R6OTjdhOTZx/A1SWouVYIHhjhlb9yoWLuus2+UcpoI WKIYB2lBDUVhjZ0nMYYY1bUwFV7UAjoVdU5Lah6TrxptizgrQDSzInATd4YTV1aEFXrt yz/wOSaUZq0CS8x1+7yKA1DCcGEwhdcn1nxjQ=
Received: by 10.227.157.70 with SMTP id a6mr536959wbx.163.1285180276258; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.170.82 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:30:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4C9A45BB.60005@ics.uci.edu>
References: <AANLkTi=zxgOCFOo+JmvyLK_D65_pvx3Zbomq0YtHG5fU@mail.gmail.com> <4C9A45BB.60005@ics.uci.edu>
From: Meadhbh Hamrick <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:30:56 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTim3Ph9OXw8GPSsds5h-T-sw43AdpB42KVEt=qAd@mail.gmail.com>
To: lopes@ics.uci.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: vwrap@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vwrap] what's wrong with starting small?
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:31:02 -0000

ossm. indeed. that is the email i was thinking about.

--
meadhbh hamrick * it's pronounced "maeve"
@OhMeadhbh * http://meadhbh.org/ * OhMeadhbh@gmail.com



On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Cristina Videira Lopes
<lopes@ics.uci.edu> wrote:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap/current/msg00318.html
> If you are talking about *this* email from John, we are on the same page.
>
> Meadhbh Hamrick wrote:
>>
>> so we have a recommendation from at least two implementers (myself and
>> john) that we focus on a small subset of an overall virtual world
>> problem domain.
>>
>> it seems to me that diva/christina and morgaine are pushing for a more
>> expansive problem domain.
>>
>> can i ask, what is the issue we have with starting small and then
>> growing the problem domain?
>>
>> i think i remember an IETF "old hand" (it might have even been barry)
>> say that it's a LOT easier to go back to the IAB / IESG and ask to add
>> things to your charter than it is to remove them.
>>
>> i'm also thinking that some of the tension in this group is over the
>> conflicting objectives between the "expansionist" block and the
>> "dimunitivist" block. but it also seems that we're not horribly far
>> off from each other in terms of wire protocol.
>>
>> maybe a solution could be to draft two documents... one a "long term"
>> goal for virtual worlds that describes the "expansionist" objectives
>> and another that is a little more short term and describes the
>> "diminutivist" objective for a small subset of things needed for the
>> long term goals?
>>
>> is the concern with this approach that any near term service (service
>> establishment, event queue, teleport, assets) would need to know about
>> the totality of the virtual world in order to be practical?
>>
>> -cheers
>> -meadhbh
>> --
>> meadhbh hamrick * it's pronounced "maeve"
>> @OhMeadhbh * http://meadhbh.org/ * OhMeadhbh@gmail.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> vwrap mailing list
>> vwrap@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
>>
>
>