IETF Logo Mail Archive

[vwrap] SPDY

Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com> Mon, 11 April 2011 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <dzonatas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6FFF3A6B21 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.296
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.296 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.303, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JcbHEIVRkSU5 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pv0-f172.google.com (mail-pv0-f172.google.com [74.125.83.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742D63A697E for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pvh1 with SMTP id 1so2562317pvh.31 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZHAXOaG46Phdski2zYzuGzJ2XoyXSQ/YCw8TnhGDxMk=; b=HZILlUrv86aR3tRmXdDPVRbJzrJKb4D4ZMH3puBhqMksl9z6Nx5aSuR1nCDPqOxT9f CfnG4av1sJXfOUgKFnT7VOXYh2u625sU2exAEjDqrnBLbSpqBue9Vv2Xb24CX+tlsLk1 vszyPItAW7wR8SFnhEozKJTYEawJFmNgOsnuY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rM5Ar4XFNAm1JO0Orov9i6h8S3MFCCRpkrPzmlfkJp77pFOhcARz1h6ockUVs/iVa7 YfaBIBLzfBJYPiPeuYLlTWyqvD/zb6p2BLRoXexSPsSEXOIjWaCyI6BdkUTL+xrTVZhx 0Qaul4bYSiVOGOmeI5//lWW/UHDEW2aOVXIIA=
Received: by 10.142.178.17 with SMTP id a17mr159911wff.64.1302536986279; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.50] ([70.133.70.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m10sm8415985wfl.23.2011.04.11.08.49.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4DA32353.7070306@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:50:43 -0700
From: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100329)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "vwrap@ietf.org" <vwrap@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: [vwrap] SPDY
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:51:53 -0000

Seems like GOOGLE did something similar to what I did with 
"bidirectional" ReSTful combines, and they called it SPDY.

(read about SPDY near the bottom)
http://www.conceivablytech.com/6696/products/google-chrome-gets-spdy-and-an-onscreen-keyboard

 >> Google said that it saw pageload times to improve by 44 to up to 
64%. According to the company, SPDY still uses HTTP methods, headers and 
“other semantics.” <<

The difference is chrome implements a modified HTTP stack (SPDY) instead 
of being limited to HTTP itself. So far, I only see a BSD style 
denotation placed on the source files.

Maybe worthwhile to investigate to see how easy it is to add the 
ReSTful/LLSD/LLIDL combines and secure the transport within any 
specified trust domain.

-- 
--- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email