Re: [vwrap] The <embed> tag... is the group still interested in LLSD or DSD?

Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com> Wed, 04 May 2011 22:59 UTC

Return-Path: <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7CBAE0717 for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:59:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.639
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.639 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.262, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_52=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mPm27q9IbgJa for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82CD8E06C7 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qwc23 with SMTP id 23so1345407qwc.31 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=aHCpt01UFLRwIHr4BDtlqdcYp4kQusOYvKJMiFvbq0k=; b=sK5ICUTrRJorUtk8KdptKm/wdVGcfdIYFhxuNdPP0STHx9yoVKsRoy97lJlPCqLCLa nwTlpBCVmTzi5xEGWPlq+oOQwjWsZG5sAAPN3zyMGyURzRKOAIAfGMjfbXLvFHveUmZH U5YJPOcdwatUPENV0LA8gBWA9mA9MSoI5qvfk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=GniPJzhcnCdunwVWvnykE/ffRbGlfCbTlJvn9OYqL9bS3yUDC6iRksRHoDCxfw0fOP BKj/U1NIRmYZahnHthW+FvqxpLr3Kq1n82/KDABlyuTqp0/uYFc2JOOW5AenRmRxXHCy cN84jvfqwchF6zJfAcH0LJaaOKyXc8cIvqCSw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.119.134 with SMTP id z6mr1335529qcq.63.1304549950597; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.66.212 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4DC1D5FC.6040608@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTi=g9T5q5bVgytpxRxuE=Oc9iG2F9w@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=K8-6oL-JJoPCfz0JjDpaRBpeOyg@mail.gmail.com> <4DC15504.3090503@gmail.com> <BANLkTikay4xhQoZs2L0uRLSXgUMfCE9yfA@mail.gmail.com> <4DC160F0.1030201@gmail.com> <BANLkTikTYpLHM=GAeGAVfufqZ5XT0FSAzw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=kjBSuMjPcgfXTUvZ3iwmS1bN50Q@mail.gmail.com> <4DC17704.3020201@gmail.com> <BANLkTimpGpNrkE3WUdurduqrVumocDRwfQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1824B.6040609@gmail.com> <BANLkTi=hhsiDs=fdZRsthp_+5Hs+pR4L6A@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1956A.5020204@gmail.com> <BANLkTik8rnsKP4xq+Gj5G4dsG=UOVnkNSQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1A8C9.9090406@gmail.com> <BANLkTikkOS34CC+ML0JNJgHDoRqbs9rY9w@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1D165.7010705@gmail.com> <4DC1D5FC.6040608@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 23:59:10 +0100
Message-ID: <BANLkTik81Eht3NTdLXXmgqOWvjc2s_KBnw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
To: vwrap@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd5c94e65afdd04a27b3448
Subject: Re: [vwrap] The <embed> tag... is the group still interested in LLSD or DSD?
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 22:59:12 -0000

I have no idea what either of the last list two posts meant.

I tried to interpret the preceding post as best I could and to find room for
technical discussion, but clearly the attempt has failed.

I'll leave it at that.


Morgaine.



===========================


On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>; wrote:

> On 05/04/2011 03:21 PM, Dzonatas Sol wrote:
>
>> Actually, I invented one tag called <embed> that does all the above
>> already, so how about the predefined embed'ed data type instead of endless
>> extensibility?
>>
>>
> On that NOTE: any more needed extensibility is transistioned into
> capabilities.
>
> Whereas, capabilities means more resources (as dynamic extensions grow);
> therefore, this requires minimization of number of connections instead of
> one connection per resource. Thus, that proportion leads into the reason for
> combined/bundled queries that I have already mentioned and implemented, as
> maximum # of connections are too easily reached without such mechanism.
>
>
> --
> --- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
> Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant
>
> _______________________________________________
> vwrap mailing list
> vwrap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
>