Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24
Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com> Fri, 01 April 2011 14:52 UTC
Return-Path: <dzonatas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D6F3A687B for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 07:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.54
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.54 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.059, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tkb2w4BGKA2O for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 07:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE04A3A6869 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 07:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iye19 with SMTP id 19so4175427iye.31 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 07:54:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Zr1AG7TusPIg+ZQs9xcnapZNdr4/HFDA8+/t+A2qMn0=; b=W2wQVgBaPeB2+zpYY2b4ClFfRhUd2+I8HCLwmAE8jcKgVR8HT5Ajc/mJ5oiBxJDFGm EfFvDD3GnPxmIcerRIgEHZqpBtTmSkCzWGUqy9f3jS1UoD1eyoVwZ+cFv8ROHQrtstm5 uEh2aVJv0rTU32TKm8rOknBo9T2ruDNROuDps=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LZ3crUmEqL1FHu+cf7omDP+qi9dHjknXs2jcUHT5uqIB6JI0pIKR75Q/DsSnY4GuuH TSakUhUZZehheV81mHLrXJesclLk5Y4HQY2yG8bt3ZlbIel155nZWvH4BG9X60Kbj8L/ AGZcDmpAzkkcCxRPzQfSlOqJOWEGZQwZc59Io=
Received: by 10.231.16.134 with SMTP id o6mr4121411iba.108.1301669644960; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 07:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.50] (adsl-71-137-195-251.dsl.scrm01.pacbell.net [71.137.195.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i20sm1510160iby.65.2011.04.01.07.54.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 01 Apr 2011 07:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4D95E734.4040002@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 07:54:44 -0700
From: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100329)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "dyerbrookme@juno.com" <dyerbrookme@juno.com>
References: <20110331.161050.4499.0@webmail03.vgs.untd.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110331.161050.4499.0@webmail03.vgs.untd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: vwrap@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 14:52:27 -0000
dyerbrookme@juno.com wrote: > > Nobody but those who need to steal them has a felt need to share the > assets of Second Life. These are made by hard-working people who have > copyrighted these assets. *Get your furry paws off them*. > > Prokofy Neva The simulators (currently) share assets between those units and the use-end (monolithic client). How you consider that transfer any different between "steal" and "not-steal" mode is quite phantom to any actual code. Please do your homework, and be sure to understand that the current code actually transfers to much private data and asset information. Your copybot concern could have an easy solution just by the non-transfer of the asset dates. If you have any knowledge of double-entry accounting, you would agree as any banker would. That's also room to optimize the protocol to transfer less data, which could mean faster transfer rates. Anyways... -- --- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol --- Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24 Dzonatas Sol
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24 Katherine Mancuso
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24 Mike Dickson
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24 Vaughn Deluca
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24 Dzonatas Sol
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24 Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24 Dzonatas Sol
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24 Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24 Dzonatas Sol
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24 Sean Hennessee
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24 Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24 Sean Hennessee
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24 Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24 Vaughn Deluca
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24 Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24 Fleep Tuque
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24 Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24 Vaughn Deluca
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24 Vaughn Deluca
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24 Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24 dyerbrookme@juno.com
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24 dyerbrookme@juno.com
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24 Dzonatas Sol