Re: [vwrap] Removing first name / last name assumptions?

Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com> Wed, 07 April 2010 05:29 UTC

Return-Path: <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEFD3A6877 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5m37eh5hC+gF for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ew0-f224.google.com (mail-ew0-f224.google.com [209.85.219.224]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417713A6862 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so338376ewy.13 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:29:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=IZjHaGTFMcep14FzbMtL3DpM+qjCCJWlOD4S/+P0Hqw=; b=H11lYi9tDFHVqx8bze62JFjaRnF8dLEweCPcXBKowjpz3PwC4QlqLZaUC3ul845Fbp OrDfStSKwMYy2wV8MLEW7ERHR7FM4ctS1R3kFB4uXUcetrVswrJBHHiiwHqV7FZuxDpH EGj3yTUg28NbsJ0HxJ2GPufLZObdChLBZC51U=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=l1o58LbZgIi1QPn6G/fxOD6YbGWJ+46Oqmt4nJadpcfIGKQlvVInTcffc3ik/2DOS0 EOC5dEtF0LOuW2CY4xJfK2Fwmnw9Fr24CDt9kMqkN17E6Z4M8NcPjBqs66r8Mz7+IkEF ZKLOTgij2yI7HoW1tzRjITjcAZr2FMggJI8bM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.213.105.66 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <x2zf72742de1004060851rfb49f5ep823a868c345ffb64@mail.gmail.com>
References: <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933DCB738C13@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> <t2jb325928b1004051220i5f1d8f04od2602f26f758f3da@mail.gmail.com> <CDB96FF3-A282-40B3-94D8-A9B6A00D8AF5@bbn.com> <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933DCB738C9B@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> <y2gb325928b1004051307u5f5e64d9zd18b70bfd8307d6a@mail.gmail.com> <y2h6c9fcc2a1004052132z77168acaq26928209fa1e3e03@mail.gmail.com> <4BBB45FA.8050408@gmail.com> <j2yb325928b1004060728n29284d7fvd848fc545d54ead9@mail.gmail.com> <4BBB4D6E.60600@gmail.com> <x2zf72742de1004060851rfb49f5ep823a868c345ffb64@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 06:29:26 +0100
Received: by 10.213.15.17 with SMTP id i17mr5096753eba.62.1270618166896; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <w2ne0b04bba1004062229x25fa4721m3ba265f6d66fd952@mail.gmail.com>
From: Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
To: vwrap@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c37927ba98704839ed8f5
Subject: Re: [vwrap] Removing first name / last name assumptions?
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 05:29:36 -0000

Thanks for confirming that, Joshua!

The nature of the agent field is a small thing, but progress has been made.
:-)


Morgaine.





======================================

On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com> wrote:

> Speaking for Linden:
>
> (1) For the purposes of VWRAP interop, it is acceptable to us to assume
> that a human readable agent identifier ("name") for Second Life can be
> coerced to and from a single string field. Today, SL firstname/lastname
> pairs are constrained to a subset of ASCII that disallows characters such as
> periods and spaces. Therefore, as has been mentioned, it is possible today
> to unambiguously encode an SL name as (firstname + "." + lastname) or
> (firstname + " " + lastname).
>
> (2) As mentioned at
> https://blogs.secondlife.com/community/features/blog/2010/01/03/happy-new-year-looking-backlooking-ahead and
> at
> https://blogs.secondlife.com/community/features/blog/2010/01/22/will-the-real-you-please-stand-up Linden
> is investigating modifications to "names" in SL. However, it is too early to
> comment on any details at this time.
>
> (3) That said, the investigative work for (2) is being done with the
> benefits of (1) held firmly in mind. (As with practically anything in the
> biz, this statement is not a contract or guarantee.)
>
> Therefore, from Linden's perspective, we can live with the proposed
> simplified requirements of a single string. If it becomes necessary to
> revisit that in the future we'll raise it.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> vwrap mailing list
> vwrap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
>
>