IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working group

Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com> Sat, 26 March 2011 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <dzonatas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152093A68C0 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 08:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qf9l2cgHvm-o for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 08:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EAC43A6859 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 08:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk30 with SMTP id 30so399596pzk.31 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 08:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wNY9aIWBGOQ0RMk4MQJ3aBDqxVDUR6U7jW9CK7DSTUA=; b=TElJqRYLEH4R25CupMGKApoO80ncDKWt/giCY0CfzsyHDtQjFTgBKXy2SS7h5ZGbXt xKaueijS2GSzz3VX/PARJsYdLd30VK+n2PhgbR+Wpltwi1VyJU8cP64OhiR76wuSszyQ rQLRruXcxHMoYJf7VFyzzdaVCAusOWRanQbpA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lbCDl7arr7NwAjVB70UIKOqFtk+96cYJP+jdBrLLiK2VNyCL959AR3rJFO9SSBFuBE BL0m3puuKc8xf/wQxJaTSEp8Oue8khYA4Ao9PjKshvulHHHyNyaTjvIqC3WS23WceyTE gWogoRwnqNGPuPFfovxUm3EJ3CjPfG3Mjhpaw=
Received: by 10.142.224.17 with SMTP id w17mr1834139wfg.13.1301153964171; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 08:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.50] (adsl-70-133-76-153.dsl.scrm01.sbcglobal.net [70.133.76.153]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x11sm2982350wfd.1.2011.03.26.08.39.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 26 Mar 2011 08:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4D8E08AB.6060707@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 08:39:23 -0700
From: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100329)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Patnad Babii <djshag@hotmail.com>
References: <AANLkTim=tpngqs8gt=sjCeOQgtUATVRXXKe11qUaNJFw@mail.gmail.com><BLU159-ds1192252375D420BE8C7C9EDCB90@phx.gbl><956AEC85-F919-4C64-96BA-277B620CAB18@gmail.com><AANLkTimLHwMb9u5Ok-44-JgHaL_EydeSHyHUQybvNpMp@mail.gmail.com><20110326135320.GC29908@alinoe.com> <AANLkTin=9a35pzm9QkGt6v5PgWAgsqomkYCBG8eSa4Xg@mail.gmail.com> <BLU159-ds79F94EC1FEF99BB62708DDCB80@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BLU159-ds79F94EC1FEF99BB62708DDCB80@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: vwrap@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working group
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:37:49 -0000

Patnad Babii wrote:
> To be honest I keep saying since the beginning of these working groups 
> (the various ones, ogpx, vwrap, mmox..) we should put aside the 
> existing stuff, work more with Opensim, since they are the key to this 
> new journey that is open virtual worlds, its good they have HyperGrid 
> already which does some amazing stuff!

OpenSim is not open in direction of development; therefore, we can not 
use opensim and expect to be free from their direction. Just because we 
do not agree with their client/server terminology should be no reason 
for them to assume out-of-bound attitudes towards anybody is ok.

The goal of opensim/lib was to reverse engineer the SL protocol, not to 
develop one from an open basis from scratch.

-- 
--- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email