IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a web browser?

JohnnyB Hammerer <johnnybhammerer@cox.net> Fri, 17 December 2010 17:08 UTC

Return-Path: <johnnybhammerer@cox.net>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79DC13A692C for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:08:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LFqceYoHmqPD for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:08:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fed1rmmtao103.cox.net (fed1rmmtao103.cox.net [68.230.241.43]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD9B3A690B for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:08:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao103.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.03.00 201-2260-125-20100507) with ESMTP id <20101217170954.KRGP22411.fed1rmmtao103.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net> for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:09:54 -0500
Received: from percula.nac.uci.edu ([128.200.62.15]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id kH9u1f00T0Kk80004H9vuB; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:09:55 -0500
X-VR-Score: 0.00
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=f6Zs+/nFpEZOEYb4sJjW7E/Uz3bXH/g9omdstQ3jfxs= c=1 sm=1 a=cVTaAc8o87wA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=bsjjKtJvmzImDPxJL8klHA==:17 a=QClWP5eysJ2EtVl5mvoA:9 a=IzoF1_-1uXYBdw5XgVUA:7 a=AwaRguID3wT_SFj_y38YYUfWYBEA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=bsjjKtJvmzImDPxJL8klHA==:117
X-CM-Score: 0.00
Authentication-Results: cox.net; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=johnnybhammerer@cox.net
Message-ID: <4D0B9962.1030904@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:09:54 -0800
From: JohnnyB Hammerer <johnnybhammerer@cox.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Fedora/3.0.10-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vwrap@ietf.org
References: <AANLkTintjQdAS=EWfiRu3oWenB42LKsNzJPDJ+5ofBRO@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinhWObg6Te2VtGYKXsxBG5=gVDS5szmjtLeOgnm@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikYn-iA7osXT_oW8rL61GhK57pp7uJVmTSGVvj7@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikYn-iA7osXT_oW8rL61GhK57pp7uJVmTSGVvj7@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a web browser?
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:08:09 -0000

I don't understand why having a web based solution needs any 
justification by technical merits.  If those developing web based 
solutions find technical adequacy in web technologies to meet their 
goals I don't see a problem.

I'll skip analogies involving lemmings.  ;-)  I will point out while I 
process most email with a dedicated email application I am very glad to 
have some web alternatives on those occasions that call for them.

John.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email