[vwrap] draft-ietf-vwrap-type-system and RFC 2817
Barry Leiba <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com> Mon, 26 July 2010 14:00 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 86A703A69F8 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>;
Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.765
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.765 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.166,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5b7dehpb38JA for
<vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pw0-f44.google.com (mail-pw0-f44.google.com
[209.85.160.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC913A691D for
<vwrap@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pwj1 with SMTP id 1so62129pwj.31 for <vwrap@ietf.org>;
Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:reply-to:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=qXDyIahkVWvXjV9/JAjMKuk+nxPQ4kXWGAGg4qdiilk=;
b=KDtSelBIVArmFljHLV9hk32UowWsW183BlmwjppyqC4q7zmyeHHBJ2n7I+avFTglO8
9YjleoP45k/RODlIlq3Ez4rUI+d9vr0lT3YPa7rwZF5WpLeewKfZJYlcJjXv+PtM/SyI
/jsni7/bfoJTmKmhU/hkaVAxo+v0/61exO8xo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
b=p65Ur/oTS+0/xHVGzxmRujI3UYzG4yyNDswjubZ3320XIaQ6czZVz+svxGHCYg+MoT
lj/Tpc+isTqa+R1TcS6KVZ8TLqlbRVcbbxWogSdZ8y1q5o9U6krH+vOE1ZicY1BQqeGE
SYTJMljhkxpY2gOxxUkvhnYBt/wnN+Z7E0+z4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.75.17 with SMTP id x17mr11490761waa.86.1280152876499;
Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.1.136 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:01:16 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTim4CJn15Ai+w3qfbJJZEDcpHAZ5sGEJO_Ho4Wch@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
To: vwrap@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: [vwrap] draft-ietf-vwrap-type-system and RFC 2817
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: barryleiba@computer.org
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group
<vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>,
<mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>,
<mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:00:56 -0000
draft-ietf-vwrap-type-system-00 has a reference to RFC 2817, which we noticed in httpbis just now, when we talked about deprecating that RFC. The reference should be to RFC 2818. It, as well as the reference to RFC 2616, should probably be informational, not normative, at least as it's used now. So how about this?: OLD LLIDL describes abstract interfaces intended to be reified over HTTP [RFC2616] or HTTPS [RFC2817]. NEW LLIDL describes abstract interfaces intended to be reified over a protocol such as HTTP [RFC2616] or HTTPS [RFC2818]. ...and change and move the references. Barry, as participant