IETF Logo Mail Archive

[vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a web browser?

Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com> Thu, 16 December 2010 07:04 UTC

Return-Path: <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7968D3A7089 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:04:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u9R+r3gr9oTZ for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:04:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06C03A7088 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:04:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so456585qyk.10 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:06:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=9JHy2yJgELsXEPqIfKuG3yiDFAelJeIgJ8im0EYpIm0=; b=CF3uBweb4r2QqnaO36pTe36KuB2dQbRDoZPVUvSY2HyTvbUbaW9VbC54jciBe25RM6 7+ETrsgFrzi0uy3yMe0Zx+J6pfFXbmD13l2IFcQilDStrLvwHj2LPyzWDkjSW0YD8zfN CIu3xkjjCD/95+tgKM/GAUAniAf7FldloQDAc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=dPWQKvxMdYnGabOwFd3aDKvPBVLDiUsPUPnJqD5M5O9jxaOJoOiQ5ffegZqc3Z/1ji RegcLToyHDsi7RGMGXAK5Yf+I5tBTUWcufNg634nXTICCFO0db6vue8NNrUWUmR8F+FK myR9Dh1XRZA+BDRtyl0y5chiTCJta1S7uygEQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.184.13 with SMTP id ci13mr1293475qcb.134.1292483196562; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:06:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.91.67 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:06:36 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 07:06:36 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTintjQdAS=EWfiRu3oWenB42LKsNzJPDJ+5ofBRO@mail.gmail.com>
From: Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
To: vwrap@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b9292cf2c47049781b169
Subject: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a web browser?
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 07:04:54 -0000

Has anyone seen a well argued technical assessment supporting the concept of
"VW client in a browser"?

I would be very interested to read such an article or post.  Everything I've
read so far doesn't hold up at all technically, and just highlights the huge
impedance mismatch.


Morgaine.




========================================

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Richard L. Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com> wrote:

> Folks on this list are probably better plugged in to this stuff than I am,
> but in case people hadn't heard: Earlier this week, Katalabs released a
> virtual world based on WebSockets and WebGL.
>
> <http://www.katalabs.com/blog/2010/11/30/kataspace-released/>
> <
> http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/12/kataspace-browser-based-virtual-world-built-with-webgl-and-html5.ars
> >
> _______________________________________________
> vwrap mailing list
> vwrap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email