Re: [vwrap] Interest in VWRAP Session at IETF79 (Beijing)
"Hurliman, John" <john.hurliman@intel.com> Mon, 27 September 2010 19:12 UTC
Return-Path: <john.hurliman@intel.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id C68A53A6D9E for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>;
Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:12:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.239
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.239 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.061,
BAYES_00=-2.599, EXTRA_MPART_TYPE=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4,
SARE_GIF_ATTACH=1.42]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pZcduM0uEhjb for
<vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B19F3A6B53 for <vwrap@ietf.org>;
Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com
with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2010 12:13:30 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.57,244,1283756400";
d="gif'147?png'147,150?scan'147,150,208,217,147,150"; a="329291518"
Received: from rrsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.31.0.57]) by
azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2010 12:13:30 -0700
Received: from rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.31.0.39]) by
rrsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.31.0.57]) with mapi;
Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:13:29 -0600
From: "Hurliman, John" <john.hurliman@intel.com>
To: "vwrap@ietf.org" <vwrap@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:13:29 -0600
Thread-Topic: [vwrap] Interest in VWRAP Session at IETF79 (Beijing)
Thread-Index: Acted+d9Lp2a6d9mSi2/rqB6QwmFgQAAArmw
Message-ID: <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933D012AD7E50C@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <AANLkTikRDe84nFFqYC4UNGOOvE_hkEU6CzpHaPwm69_n@mail.gmail.com>
<OF8EF0CFC3.E7D4F0E4-ON852577AB.00691D66-852577AB.00693184@us.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <OF8EF0CFC3.E7D4F0E4-ON852577AB.00691D66-852577AB.00693184@us.ibm.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/related;
boundary="_006_62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933D012AD7E50Crrsmsx506amrc_";
type="multipart/alternative"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [vwrap] Interest in VWRAP Session at IETF79 (Beijing)
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group
<vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>,
<mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>,
<mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:12:54 -0000
Not sure if you were requesting individual yea/nays, but I am unable to make the trip to Beijing for this session. John From: vwrap-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:vwrap-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of David W Levine Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 12:09 PM To: Joshua Bell Cc: vwrap@ietf.org; vwrap-bounces@ietf.org Subject: Re: [vwrap] Interest in VWRAP Session at IETF79 (Beijing) We clearly have enough material to benefit from a f2f. I could, possibly justify it, but only if there was a clear list of people who would be there with the intent of making serious progress. [cid:image001.gif@01CB5E3D.65191630]Joshua Bell ---09/27/2010 02:15:31 PM---(as chair) The deadline for requesting a Working Group session at IETF 79 in Beijing is From: Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com<mailto:josh@lindenlab.com>> To: vwrap@ietf.org<mailto:vwrap@ietf.org> Date: 09/27/2010 02:15 PM Subject: [vwrap] Interest in VWRAP Session at IETF79 (Beijing) Sent by: vwrap-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:vwrap-bounces@ietf.org> ________________________________ (as chair) The deadline for requesting a Working Group session at IETF 79 in Beijing is today. There's certainly lots of discussion on the VWRAP list at the moment; we seem to be in a phase of stepping back and revisiting the decisions that led to the chartering of the group. I'm unsure if we're approaching consensus on directions (new or old), but I admit to being a bit behind in my e-mail processing. Are there WG participants that are planning to attend the Beijing IETF meeting who would want a VWRAP session and can propose agenda items that could gain a fair amount of closure at such a meeting? It does seem like we would benefit greatly from the high bandwidth/low latency capabilities of a face-to-face meeting, especially at this juncture. On the other hand, I'm not sure of the abilities of most of the WG contributors to attend. (I don't believe I would be able to attend, for example.) If you'll be attending, please speak up. Joshua _______________________________________________ vwrap mailing list vwrap@ietf.org<mailto:vwrap@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
- [vwrap] Interest in VWRAP Session at IETF79 (Beij… Joshua Bell
- Re: [vwrap] Interest in VWRAP Session at IETF79 (… David W Levine
- Re: [vwrap] Interest in VWRAP Session at IETF79 (… Hurliman, John