Re: [vwrap] Interest in VWRAP Session at IETF79 (Beijing)
David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com> Mon, 27 September 2010 19:11 UTC
Return-Path: <dwl@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id AD0C93A6DA0; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:11:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.289
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.289 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.654,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4,
SARE_GIF_ATTACH=1.42, TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_NAME_MID=0.543]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BhTJ4DGMxUi0;
Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com (e8.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.138]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576C43A6DA3;
Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:11:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (d01relay05.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.237])
by e8.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o8RIo4fJ006836;
Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:50:04 -0400
Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by
d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o8RJ95In139960;
Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:09:05 -0400
Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by
d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id
o8RJ95ir024972; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:09:05 -0300
Received: from d01ml605.pok.ibm.com (d01ml605.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.91]) by
d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id
o8RJ95d0024969; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:09:05 -0300
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikRDe84nFFqYC4UNGOOvE_hkEU6CzpHaPwm69_n@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikRDe84nFFqYC4UNGOOvE_hkEU6CzpHaPwm69_n@mail.gmail.com>
X-KeepSent: 8EF0CFC3:E7D4F0E4-852577AB:00691D66; type=4; name=$KeepSent
To: Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.1FP1 SHF20 February 10, 2010
Message-ID: <OF8EF0CFC3.E7D4F0E4-ON852577AB.00691D66-852577AB.00693184@us.ibm.com>
From: David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:09:00 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML605/01/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1HF41 |
October 22, 2009) at 09/27/2010 15:09:05
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/related;
Boundary="0__=0ABBFD38DFFA9BF68f9e8a93df938690918c0ABBFD38DFFA9BF6"
Cc: vwrap@ietf.org, vwrap-bounces@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vwrap] Interest in VWRAP Session at IETF79 (Beijing)
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group
<vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>,
<mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>,
<mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:11:29 -0000
We clearly have enough material to benefit from a f2f. I could, possibly
justify it, but only if there was a clear list of people who would be there
with the intent of
making serious progress.
From: Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
To: vwrap@ietf.org
Date: 09/27/2010 02:15 PM
Subject: [vwrap] Interest in VWRAP Session at IETF79 (Beijing)
Sent by: vwrap-bounces@ietf.org
(as chair)
The deadline for requesting a Working Group session at IETF 79 in Beijing
is today.
There's certainly lots of discussion on the VWRAP list at the moment; we
seem to be in a phase of stepping back and revisiting the decisions that
led to the chartering of the group. I'm unsure if we're approaching
consensus on directions (new or old), but I admit to being a bit behind in
my e-mail processing.
Are there WG participants that are planning to attend the Beijing IETF
meeting who would want a VWRAP session and can propose agenda items that
could gain a fair amount of closure at such a meeting?
It does seem like we would benefit greatly from the high bandwidth/low
latency capabilities of a face-to-face meeting, especially at this
juncture. On the other hand, I'm not sure of the abilities of most of the
WG contributors to attend. (I don't believe I would be able to attend, for
example.)
If you'll be attending, please speak up.
Joshua
_______________________________________________
vwrap mailing list
vwrap@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
- [vwrap] Interest in VWRAP Session at IETF79 (Beij… Joshua Bell
- Re: [vwrap] Interest in VWRAP Session at IETF79 (… David W Levine
- Re: [vwrap] Interest in VWRAP Session at IETF79 (… Hurliman, John