IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vwrap] Why are we standardizing the login handshake? (was RE: one question)

"Hurliman, John" <john.hurliman@intel.com> Fri, 24 September 2010 23:04 UTC

Return-Path: <john.hurliman@intel.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE2F3A6AF5 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.224
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.224 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.375, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WpJgYD134R+o for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5713A69A4 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2010 16:05:11 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,232,1283756400"; d="scan'208";a="610185978"
Received: from rrsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.31.0.33]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2010 16:05:11 -0700
Received: from rrsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com (10.31.0.151) by rrsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com (10.31.0.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:05:10 -0600
Received: from rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.31.0.39]) by rrsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.31.0.151]) with mapi; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:05:10 -0600
From: "Hurliman, John" <john.hurliman@intel.com>
To: "vwrap@ietf.org" <vwrap@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:05:10 -0600
Thread-Topic: [vwrap] Why are we standardizing the login handshake? (was RE: one question)
Thread-Index: ActcPHOeODcJIO+JQeKmRewTBzWnhQAACf0g
Message-ID: <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933D012AD7E0FF@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933D012AD7E06A@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> <4C9D20F5.2020507@ics.uci.edu> <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933D012AD7E094@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> <4C9D2331.1090000@ics.uci.edu> <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933D012AD7E0CC@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> <4C9D2903.6000404@ics.uci.edu> <AANLkTimrCDEktypZwNf5w6FnTwjxVWLiaio_rNQ=sjui@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimrCDEktypZwNf5w6FnTwjxVWLiaio_rNQ=sjui@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [vwrap] Why are we standardizing the login handshake? (was RE: one question)
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:04:39 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: vwrap-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:vwrap-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Meadhbh Hamrick
> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 4:01 PM
> To: Crista Lopes
> Cc: vwrap@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [vwrap] Why are we standardizing the login handshake? (was
> RE: one question)
> 
> because we like capabilities for reasons described earlier this week.
> 
> i know morgaine likes to say the intro is beyond repair, but if you actually
> read it, there are some interesting little nuggets.
> 

Don't put Morgaine in a raft by himself on this one. I've made that statement, Jonathan has made that statement, and I believe Crista is making that statement here as well. Everyone else has not weighed in on either direction, so I was being very generous when I said the group is evenly split on the issue. I agree that there are some great bits in the intro doc, but that's why computers have copy paste.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email