Re: [vwrap] The <embed> tag... is the group still interested in LLSD or DSD?

Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com> Wed, 04 May 2011 22:42 UTC

Return-Path: <dzonatas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C0FE06DF for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.512
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.512 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.513, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_52=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iev0OFJIhbMZ for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:42:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-px0-f179.google.com (mail-px0-f179.google.com [209.85.212.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C02E06CB for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:42:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pxi2 with SMTP id 2so1010038pxi.38 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:42:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gK/yLjRuPmJVVUcWV8/ZSee4gejC4cMLHTYXssDRtGc=; b=XHRWLVFBa8ckVfevh39tCaYTkMhn0oqiUP+TrKhs4TPMfz+xpSKfKLX265QITq1H1T 4TT1mjUyNZGX9EhOTfOWExYgU9LaPfidWvklkX4VrPTynah+kNbZXU+faF8WMPhA9QXY dj/blYHv6JG0/4Ofzf1NkJ1FPE2+z3j9nA9m8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MKdJh/zQQPtiQ/G+ATMp5lTMr18GOjGVSOLXWn6cNpjXrdur5gy6aVtCABxlekz98d X9/h9YzDlt0QrG2Mt+hXbKXfMVbo5cd+lzt7RPk4JNiMa2cW6Lp4GdBnixf/iQNpj/NT 4nTmXXEK2fW/YMdeVDXGQVHb0yT9YNlAL+7WU=
Received: by 10.68.57.209 with SMTP id k17mr2174413pbq.280.1304548925434; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:42:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.50] ([70.133.70.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k7sm1003928pbe.32.2011.05.04.15.42.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 04 May 2011 15:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4DC1D5FC.6040608@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 15:41:00 -0700
From: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110307 Icedove/3.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTi=g9T5q5bVgytpxRxuE=Oc9iG2F9w@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=K8-6oL-JJoPCfz0JjDpaRBpeOyg@mail.gmail.com> <4DC15504.3090503@gmail.com> <BANLkTikay4xhQoZs2L0uRLSXgUMfCE9yfA@mail.gmail.com> <4DC160F0.1030201@gmail.com> <BANLkTikTYpLHM=GAeGAVfufqZ5XT0FSAzw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=kjBSuMjPcgfXTUvZ3iwmS1bN50Q@mail.gmail.com> <4DC17704.3020201@gmail.com> <BANLkTimpGpNrkE3WUdurduqrVumocDRwfQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1824B.6040609@gmail.com> <BANLkTi=hhsiDs=fdZRsthp_+5Hs+pR4L6A@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1956A.5020204@gmail.com> <BANLkTik8rnsKP4xq+Gj5G4dsG=UOVnkNSQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1A8C9.9090406@gmail.com> <BANLkTikkOS34CC+ML0JNJgHDoRqbs9rY9w@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1D165.7010705@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DC1D165.7010705@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: vwrap@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vwrap] The <embed> tag... is the group still interested in LLSD or DSD?
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 22:42:06 -0000

On 05/04/2011 03:21 PM, Dzonatas Sol wrote:
> Actually, I invented one tag called <embed> that does all the above 
> already, so how about the predefined embed'ed data type instead of 
> endless extensibility?
>

On that NOTE: any more needed extensibility is transistioned into 
capabilities.

Whereas, capabilities means more resources (as dynamic extensions grow); 
therefore, this requires minimization of number of connections instead 
of one connection per resource. Thus, that proportion leads into the 
reason for combined/bundled queries that I have already mentioned and 
implemented, as maximum # of connections are too easily reached without 
such mechanism.

-- 
--- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant